Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Urology
  •  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2020;5(1):2853.Research Article | Open Access

Analysis of the Cesarean Index in Patients Primigests of Different Age Groups

Mayela Diamantina Cruz-Gutiérrez* and Abel Guzman-Lopez

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and University Hospital “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez”, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, México

*Correspondance to: Mayela Diamantina Cruz-GutiĆ©rrez 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2853

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean section as a birth route is associated with an increased risk of long-term complications, such as placenta previa, placental accretion, and post-operative, such as endometritis, dehiscence, and/or surgical wound infection. Objective: To describe the main indications in primigraphic patients divided into 3 age groups who attended the “Dr. José Eleuterio González” for your attention from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional, observational, descriptive and prospective study in 384 patients. The pre-operative sheet of the clinical record was analyzed: The indication of the surgical procedure and information was collected from the newborns (weight, height, Apgar and Capurro), as well as aggregate pathologies. Results: Group 1 was made up of 281 patients with an average age of 16.8 years, group 2 included 101 patients with a mean age of 21.5 years, and group 3 consisted of 2 patients. The main indications for cesarean section were DCP×PN (33.9%), contraction dystocia (14.6%) and failed induction (13%). Of the total number of patients admitted, 10.6% were admitted with HDPC of which, 31.7% classified as gestational hypertension, 36.58% were categorized as mild preeclampsia, 21.95% ended as severe preeclampsia, and 9.75% were categorized as eclampsia. Conclusion: There is no difference between the main indications for caesarean section among the studied population (women younger than 20 years old, aged between 21 to 35 years old and older than 36 years old).

Keywords

Cite the article

Cruz-Gutiérrez MD, Guzman-Lopez A. Analysis of the Cesarean Index in Patients Primigests of Different Age Groups. Clin Surg. 2020; 5: 2853..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Antimicrobial Peptides: A Potential Therapeutic Option for Surgical Site Infections
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Is There an Optimal Time-Window for the Minimally Invasive Puncture Evacuation Surgery in Intracerebral Hemorrhage?
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Effect of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Plus Additional Support on Blood Pressure Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...