Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Bariatric Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2021;6(1):3228.Research Article | Open Access

Evaluation of HSG and SIS Diagnostic Value in Comparison to Hysteroscopy to Detect Intrauterine Abnormalities in Infertile Women in Iran

Leila Nazari and Parisa Taherzadeh Boroujeni

Preventative Gynecology Research Center (PGRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Obstetrician Gynecologist Infertility, IVF Center Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran

*Correspondance to: Parisa Taherzadeh Boroujeni 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3228

Abstract

Objective: Hysteroscopy is the gold standard in evaluation of uterine cavity. However, being invasive and its possible adverse effects have reduced popularity of hysteroscopy and clinicians have always been looking for a valid alternative for hysteroscopy. In the current study, we aimed to compare diagnostic value of saline induced sonography with HSG in diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities. Material and Method: We performed a retrospective study on 81 infertile women who underwent hysteroscopy, SIS and HSG at Taleghani infertility center during their IVF treatment course. Polyp, fibroids, adhesion and septate uterus were considered as abnormality. We reported agreement percent, kappa, sensitivity, and specificity, area under curve, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for both SIS and HSG. Results: Total agreement between SIS and hysteroscopy was 85.1, while it was 23.4 for HSG. We also observed considerably higher kappa for SIS (80.1%) than HSG (15.5%). Overall sensitivity and specificity of SIS for diagnosis of all type of anomaly including both uterine abnormalities and Acquired uterine pathologies was 90.1% (95% CI = 80.7, 95.9) and 90.0% (95% CI = 55.5, 99.7). Meanwhile overall sensitivity and specificity of hysterosalpingography where hysteroscopy was considered as the gold standard was 54.9 (42.7, 66.8) and 50.0 (18.7, 81.3). Conclusion: SIS is more sensitive tools than HSG for diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities and could be considered one of the best alternatives of hysteroscopy. It provides more accurate detail diagnostic information with high sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

Hysterosalpingography; Sonography; Imaging in infertility; Intrauterine
abnormalities

Cite the article

Nazari L, Boroujeni PT. Evaluation of HSG and SIS Diagnostic Value in Comparison to Hysteroscopy to Detect Intrauterine Abnormalities in Infertile Women in Iran. Clin Surg. 2021; 6: 3228..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Antimicrobial Peptides: A Potential Therapeutic Option for Surgical Site Infections
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Prognosis of Directional Atherectomy Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Bare Nitinol Stent Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis Obliterans: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Recurrent and Refractory Ischemic Stroke Complicating Evans Syndrome
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...