Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Gynecological Surgery
  •  Surgical Oncology
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2019;4(1):2318.Research Article | Open Access

Do Cavity Shave Margins Help Breast Conserving Surgery Outcomes?

Emma Huebner, Thomas Duncan, Javier Romero, Graal Diaz, Ken Waxman and Shawn Steen

Division of Surgery, Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, CA, USA
Division of Surgical Oncology, Anacapa Surgical Associates, Ventura, CA, USA

*Correspondance to: Shawn Steen 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2318

Abstract

Breast conservation surgery yields positive margin with tumor in up to two-thirds of cases, often leading to re-excision. The removal of cavity shave margins has been an attempt to decrease the rate of positive margin. In this case-controlled, age-matched study, 139 patients who underwent breast conservation therapy with or without resection of additional margins were retrospectively assigned to an Additional Margins (AM) group or No Additional Margins (NAM) group. The rates of primary specimen positive margin, tumor presence in the additional margins, and final positive margin were analyzed. Removal of shave margins in the AM group contained additional multifocal cancer in 23% cases in which the primary specimen had negative margins. Despite finding this additional disease, the rate of final positive margin in the AM group was still less than the NAM group (21% and 40%, respectively, p<0.01). Fellowship-trained breast surgeons performed 97% of the surgeries in the AM group, while general surgeons performed 57% of the surgeries in the NAM group. Thus the positive margin rates were likely biased by surgical technique. Our findings suggest that resection of additional margins may be more beneficial in identifying multifocal disease than in decreasing the rate of positive margin and re-excision.

Keywords

Cite the article

Huebner E, Duncan T, Romero J, Diaz G, Waxman K, Steen S. Do Cavity Shave Margins Help Breast Conserving Surgery Outcomes? Clin Surg. 2019; 4: 2318.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Curcumin-Induced Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Exosomes Alter Adipogenic Differentiation Capabilities
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
A Novel Anatomical Locking Plate Fixation for T-Shaped Acetabular Fracture: Finite Element Analysis
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...