Journal Basic Info
- Impact Factor: 2.395**
- H-Index: 8
- ISSN: 2474-1647
- DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
Major Scope
- Urology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterological Surgery
- Endocrine Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- General Surgery
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Abstract
Citation: Clin Surg. 2016;1(1):1267.Review Article | Open Access
Two Field versus three Field Lymphadenectomy in Carcinoma Esophagus: Current Perspectives
Saravanan MN
Department of GI Surgery & Liver Transplant, GB Pant Institute of PGMER, India
*Correspondance to: Saravanan MN
PDF Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1267
Abstract
The extent of lymphadenectomy in curative resection for esophageal cancer can be a standard 2-field, extended 2-field or a 3-field lymphadenectomy. Japanese surgeons base their adoption of the 3-field lymphadenectomy (3FL) on the superior survival with comparable mortality even though morbidity is higher compared to the 2-field lymphadenectomy (2FL). Selective performance of 3FL based on sentinel node sampling and other imaging strategies has been described. Thoraco-laparoscopic approach has been increasingly utilised in the performance of systematic lymphadenectomy. There is still no clear consensus on the choice between 2FL and 3FL.
Keywords
Lymphadenectomy; Thoraco-laparoscopic approach; Esophageal cancer
Cite the article
Saravanan MN. Two Field versus three Field Lymphadenectomy in Carcinoma Esophagus: Current Perspectives. Clin Surg. 2016; 1: 1267.
