Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Ophthalmic Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Gynecological Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Gastroenterological Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery


Citation: Clin Surg. 2016;1(1):1087.Research Article | Open Access

Same Operation, Same Robot, Different Countries:Does it make a Difference?

Cristina Falavolti, Federico Sergi, Tommasangelo Petitti, Vincenzo Pagliarulo and Maurizio Buscarini

Department of Urology, Campus Biomedico University, Italy
Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Italy
Hygiene and Public Health Researcher, Campus Biomedico University, Italy
Department of Urology, University of Bari, Italy

*Correspondance to: Falavolti Cristina 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1087


Objective: To investigate the impact that surgeon and operative room team experience rule in operative time and surgical outcomes.Material and
Methods: We retrospectively collected data of 150 robotic radical prostatectomy (RALPs) performed by the same surgeon in two different hospitals in different periods of his robotic experience. The first and the last 50 RALPs performed in a dedicated center of robotic surgery at University of Southern California were included respectively in group 1 and group 2. The first 50 RALPs performed at University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome were included in group 3. In this case, both first assistant and nursing team were at the beginning of their robotic experience. Monovariate analysis was performed comparing each group in terms of oncological and surgical outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the risk of positive margin.Results: The mean docking time in group 2 and 3 decreases significantly compared to group 1. In group 3 the operative time is significant longer. The mean estimated blood loss is higher in group 1 and the number of transfusions decreases in group 2 and 3. The probability to have surgical positive margins increases from pT2a-b-c to pT3b tumor stage. The study is limited because of its retrospective form.Conclusion: Surgeon, assistant, and nurses have a cardinal role in operative and surgical outcomes. Tumor stage is the principle parameter that influences the oncological outcome. About 50 procedures are required to reach satisfactory operative outcomes although the learning curve continues for hundreds procedures.


Cite the article

Cristina F, Sergi F, Petitti T, Maurizio B, Pagliarulo V. Same Operation, Same Robot, Different Countries: Does it make a Difference? Clin Surg. 2016; 1: 1087.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Automated Sagittal Craniosynostosis Classification from CT Images Using Transfer Learning
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Sclerotherapy with Polidocanol Foam is a Promising Perspective Treatment for Pyogenic Granuloma: A Retrospective Analysis in 52 Cases
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Evaluation of the Perimamillar Breast-Conserving Surgery as a Standard Level-I Modified Round Block Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...