Research Article
The use of Ultrasonic Dissector in the Prevention of Risk in Thyroid Surgery
Grasso E1* and Guastella T2
1Department of Emergency Surgery, Molfetta “Don Tonino Bello” Hospital, Italy
2Department of Emergency Surgery and PS, University of Catania, Italy
*Corresponding author: Emanuele Grasso, Department of Emergency Surgery, Molfetta “Don Tonino Bello” Hospital, Italy
Published: 06 Dec, 2016
Cite this article as: Grasso E, Guastella T. The use of
Ultrasonic Dissector in the Prevention
of Risk in Thyroid Surgery. Clin Surg.
2016; 1: 1212.
Abstract
Aim: The execution of a correct hemostasis in thyroid surgery is extremely important both for the recognition of the delicate anatomical structures surrounding the thyroid, and to avoid damage of
the same with haemostatic maneuvers incongruous. The ultrasonic dissector, developed in ’90s,
allows for adequate hemostasis of caliber vessels of diameter up to 3mm, and at the same time has a
minimum heat dispersion on the surrounding tissues could be used with the necessary precautions
in close proximity to vital structures. We present our experience using the ultrasonic dissector in
thyroid surgery.
Material and Methods: It was carried out a retrospective study of patients operated on thyroid
from March 2008 to March 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on the hemostatic
technique used: in the conventional technique we used titanium clips, ties and pliers bipolar; in
ultrasound technique we have given preference to the ultrasonic dissector but have been used
sporadically ligatures and bipolar forceps. It was assessed the duration, the average length of
hospitalization, the occurrence of complications and the amount of blood present in the drainage.
Results: From 2008 to 2012 underwent thyroid surgery 148 patients. They were 29 men and 119
women of average age 52 aa (range 22-82). They were performed lobectomy 38 and 110 total
thyroidectomy. There were 28 cancers, of which 1 in Hashimoto, Graves 5, 7 hyper functioning
adenomas and 107 multinodular goiters. The patients were treated with conventional hemostasis in
64 cases and with the aid of the ultrasonic dissector in 84 cases. The operative time was significantly
shorter in patients treated with the ultrasonic dissector (106±23 vs. 148±34 min). The postoperative
complications were similar in both groups: we had a total of 4 single-sided momentary paralysis of
the recurrent nerve, 1 final. There were two cases of permanent hypocalcemia, one for each group,
however, we had a momentary hypocalcemia in 11% (7) of patients treated with Ultracision and in
29.7% (25) of patients treated with conventional therapy. The duration of hospitalization was similar
in both groups (1.5±2 days). In the group treated with dissector there was a minor oozing serum
sanguineous (45±27 vs. 54±51 mL) although that group has manifested a case of severe bleeding
(400 ml) which did not require reoperation.
Conclusion: The Ultracision has proven to be a valuable aid in thyroid surgery. Although the data
are insufficient to enable a final decision certainly this tool is proved to have resulted in a reduction
in the intervention of the complications of thyroidectomy reducing surgical time and bleeding risk.
Keywords: Thyroid; Ultrasonic dissector; Thyroidectomy
Introduction
The treatment of choice for many thyroid diseases today is represented by total thyroidectomy.
Very frequent intervention in endocrine surgery [1]. The thyroid is an organ which presents
many vessels, the control of hemostasis is essential to prevent complications such as bleeding
and bruising. Other complications in the course of thyroidectomy are: laryngeal nerve palsy and
hypoparathyroidism [2]. Good hemostasis to prevent blood loss and bleeding during surgery. So
reducing the possibility of potential complication of the parathyroid gland, laryngeal nerves and postsurgery
bleeding. Control of the bleeding is possible with clamp and tie use clips of electrocautery
and innovative technique of accuracy an hemostasis and reducing of complication post operative
[3]. This tool allows of simultaneous cutting and tissue coagulation with dissection and hemostasis.
Also you can reduce thermal spread and minimal adjacent tissue destruction and it's minimally
invasive [4]. The fist reference about the use of the ultrasonic scalpel in thyroid surgery dates back
to 2000 [5]. Numerous studies have confirmed the validity of this
innovative technology [6].
The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of ultrasonic scalpel in
thyroid surgery compared of the traditional technique in a significant
number of patients (144). We conducted a retrospective randomized
study to identify particularly: analysis of complications, surgical time,
overall drainage volume and duration of the hospital stay.
Table 1
Materials and Methods
It was carried out a retrospective study of patients operated
on thyroid from March 2008 to March 2012. The 144 patients
undergoing total thyroidectomy surgery gave informed consensus
of the study and were randomly divided into two groups based
on the hemostatic technique used. The patients were treated with
conventional hemostasis in 64 cases (group A), while with the aid of
the ultrasonic dissector in 84 cases (group B). Group A, treated with
the conventional technique, we used titanium clips, ligatures and
bipolar forceps; group treated in ultrasound technique, we have given
preference to the ultrasonic dissector but have been used sporadically
ligatures and bipolar forceps. The comparative preoperative data
between the two groups included: age, gender, preoperative serum
calcium and thyroid pathology.
Was assessed the duration, the average length of hospitalization,
the occurrence of complications and the amount of blood present in
the drainage. The duration of surgery was estimated in minutes from
skin incision to skin closure.
The postoperative valuation included analysis both of
complications (laryngeal nerve palsy, hypoparathyroidism, blood
loss, hematoma, seroma, wound infection) and the features after the
pre and post surgery (size of the thyroid specimen, postoperative
serum calcium levels, overall drained, pain, medications).
In both groups, a suction drain for each thyroid side was placed
after surgery and removed between the 1st and 3rd post surgery days.
Serum calcium levels was monitored 12, 24, 48 hours
postoperatively and patients were discharged between the 2nd and
4th post-operative day.
Results
From 2008 to 2012 underwent thyroid surgery 148 patients. They
were 29 men and 119 women of average age 52 aa (range 22-82).
They were performed lobectomy 38 and 110 total thyroidectomy.
There were 28 cancers, of which 1 in Hashimoto, Graves 5, 7
hyperfunctioning adenomas and 107 multinodular goiters. The
patients were treated with conventional hemostasis in 64 cases and
with the aid of the ultrasonic dissector in 84 cases.
There were no significant differences between the two groups
regarding age, sex, serum calcium values pre-and post surgery,
reoperations, weight and diameter of the thyroid specimen, final
histopathologic diagnosis.
The operative time was significantly shorter in patients treated with
the ultrasonic dissector (106±23 vs. 148±34 min). The postoperative
complications were similar in both groups: we had a total of 4 singlesided
momentary paralysis of the recurrent nerve, 1 final. There were
two cases of permanent hypocalcemia, one for each group, however,
we had a momentary hypocalcemia in 11% (7) of patients treated with
Ultracision and in 29.7% (25) of patients treated with conventional
therapy. The duration of hospitalization was similar in both groups
(1.5±2 days). In the group treated with dissector there was a minor
oozing serum sanguineous (45±27 vs. 54±51 mL) although that
group has manifested a case of severe bleeding (400 ml) which did
not require reoperation (Table 1).
Discussion
The innovative advances in recent years have developed devices
aiming to facilitate the surgical procedures in terms of efficient
hemostasis, tissue ligation, and dissection, as well as reduction of
surgical time. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system and
activated ultrasonic shears represents an alternative technique for
hemostasis and the operative risk in surgery. Ultrasound is used in
many medical disciplines such as cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery,
urology, gynecology and general surgery. In recent years she has
found application in thyroidectomy. High frequency ultrasound
allows cutting and coagulation the low-temperature fabrics and
electively causing less tissue damage by electrocautery and laser [7].
The Food and Drug Administration has approved Ligasure
for ligation of vessels up to 7 mm in diameter. Thermal damage is
limited to 2 to 3 mm beyond the tissue grasped within the forceps of
the device [8 and 9]. This is a particularly important property in thyroid
surgery because it allows safe vascular ligation with minimal risk for
damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the external branch of the
superior laryngeal nerve, and the parathyroid glands. The literature
confirms there is less blood loss (-45%) [10], less post operative pain
(-40, 5%) [11] lower consumption of pain medication(-38%) [12], less
drainage volume (-50, 5%), smaller and better aesthetic scars [12] and
significant reduction in operative time(-47% on average) [11] rapid
and effective hemostasis with minimal tissue damages, a significant
reduction of time also in terms of use of the operating room (-24
minutes) [11].
An important issue concerning the use of these new sealing
modalities is the extent of lateral thermal spread and associated
tissue injury. Several experimental studies, however, have proved that
this extent is minimal (from 0 to 3 mm) [8,9] and, moreover, all the
reported studies in the literature show that they can be used safely in
thyroid surgery with no increase in complication rates [13-14].
Lateral thermal damage is limited up to 2 mm beyond the tissue
grasped within the forceps of the device [15]. This is an important
property in thyroid surgery because it allows safe vascular ligation
with minimal risk for damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the
external branch of superior laryngeal nerve, and the parathyroid
glands.
Conclusion
The harmonic scalpel is safe, useful, and time saving adjuncts for thyroid surgery. The main advantage of this device is simplifying the procedure and eliminates the need for clips and suture ligations while achieving efficient hemostasis. In our study, they were found to be similarly safe and efficient in terms of hemostasis, surgical time, andThe Ultracision has proven to be a valuable aid in thyroid surgery. Although the data are insufficient to enable a final decision certainly this tool is proved to have resulted in a reduction in the intervention of the complications of thyroidectomy reducing surgical time and bleeding risk.
References
- Ciuni A, Biondi A, Di Giunta M, Basile F, Ciuni S. Total thyroidectomy vs. subtotal Thyroidectomy for plurinodular goiter. Analysis 1517 cases. Ann. Ital Chir. 2010; 81: 9-12.
- Vaiman M, Nagibin A, Olevson J. Complications in primary and completed Thyroidectomy. Surg Today. 2010; 40: 114-118.
- Tysome JR, Hassan R, Davis J. Standard bipolar diathermy forceps vessel ligation is safe in thyroidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 266: 1781-1786.
- Gentileschi P, D'Ugo S, Iaculli E, Gaspari AL. Harmonic Focus versus “Knot tying” during total thyroidectomy: A randomized trials.Updates Surg. 2011; 63: 277-281.
- Sandonato L, Cipolla C, Graceffa G, Fricano S, Li' Petri S, Prinzi G, et.al. La coagulazione elettrotermica bipolare in chirurgia della tiroide.Chir Ital. 2003; 55:41-15.
- Shermen L. Thyroidectomy using the harmonic scalpel: Analysis of 105 consecutive cases. Otolaryngol Hed Neck Surg. 2002; 127: 284-288.
- McCarus SD. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996; 3: 601-608.
- Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, Collyer W, et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol. 2003; 169: 697-700.
- Goldstein SL, Harold KL, Lentzner A, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, et al. Comparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the Laparo-Sonic ultrasonic shears and the Ligasure system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002; 12: 61-63.
- Defeehereux T, Rinken F, Maweja S, Hamoir E, Meurisse M. Evalutation of the ultracision disseclor in thyroid surgery. A prospecttive Randomised study. Acta Chir Belg. 2003; 103: 274-77.
- Del Rio P, Bezer L, Palladino S, Arcui MF, Lotti E, Sianesi M. Operative time and posopative pain following minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidecomy. G Chir. 2010; 31: 155-158.
- Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Cicchieti A, Marchetti M, De Crea C, Di Bidino R, et al. The use of ”Harmonic scalpel” versus “konot thing” for conventional “open” thyroidectomy. Results of a prospective randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surger. 2008; 393: 627-631.
- Dror A, Salim M, Yoseph R. Sutureless thyroidectomy using electrothermal system: a new technique. J Laryngol Otol. 2003; 117: 198-201.
- Ortega J, Sala C, Flor B, Lledo S. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Ultracision harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: an analysis of 200 cases in a randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004; 14: 9-12.
- Cordon C, Fajardo R, Ramirez J, Herrera MF. A randomized, prospective, parallel group study comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to electrocauteryin thyroidectomy. Surgery. 2005; 137: 337-341.