Research Article
Global Practice vs. Research on Bariatric Surgery Over the Last Decade
Koray Bas1*, Serhan Derici1, Tugba Arkan2, Serkan Yener2 and Koray Atila1
1Department of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Turkey
2Department of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Turkey
*Corresponding author: Koray Bas, Department of General Surgery, Division of Bariatric and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Balcova, Turkey
Published: 05 Dec, 2016
Cite this article as: Bas K, Derici S, Arkan T, Yener S, Atila
K. Global Practice vs. Research on
Bariatric Surgery Over the Last Decade.
Clin Surg. 2016; 1: 1201.
Abstract
Background: Publishing scientific researches should be considered as important as practice in
medicine. The aim of this study is to evaluate trends of scientific productivity comparing with
practice of each IFSO-member countries on bariatric surgery over the last decade.
Methods: The Thomson Reuters Web of Science was used to obtain numbers of bariatric surgeryrelated
studies published by each IFSO-member countries in four certain time spans 2003-2004,
2008-2009, 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. Then each country’s publication rates per bariatric procedure
were calculated for these time periods due to reports of IFSO in 2003, 2008, 2011 and 2013.
Results: The highest number of publications and procedures on bariatric surgery were achieved by
USA in all time spans. USA also has the largest volume of bariatric surgeons in 2003 and 2008. Then
Brazil replaced the first rank for numbers of bariatric surgeons in 2011 and bariatric centers in 2013.
In 2003-2004, the total number of bariatric surgery-related publications was 644 published by
26 IFSO-member countries and the total estimated number of bariatric procedure was 43,301
which performed by those countries. In 2013-2014, the total number of bariatric surgery-related
publications was 4,026 which published by 56 IFSO-member countries and the total estimated
number of bariatric procedure was 468,609 which performed by those countries.
Conclusion: We can roughly claim that global scientific productivity on bariatric surgery has not
been increased in parallel increasing numbers of bariatric procedures and surgeons over the last
decade. Our study should be a call that research efforts must be supported by governments or private
institutions. In addition, creating and maintaining national and international "registry" systems, as
IFSO, is essential to obtain reliable data.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Bibliometric analysis; IFSO
Introduction
The morbidity and mortality associated with obesity have been known to the medical profession
more than 2000 years [1]. Mean body mass index (BMI) has been increasing in prevalence in adults,
adolescents, and children, and is now considered to be a global epidemic, recently with 36.9 percent
of men and 38 percent of women estimated to have a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 [2,3]. Therefore bariatric
surgery is one of the fastest growing operative procedures performed worldwide, with an estimated
>340,000 operations performed in 2011 [4]. The growth rate of bariatric surgery in Asia was 449
percent between 2005 and 2009 [5].
The first known surgical procedure aimed at reducing body weight was performed by Victor
Henrikson in Sweden in 1952, was only a small bowel resection. The first real obesity surgery
procedure was the jejunoileal bypass (JIB) performed by Kremen and Linner in USA in 1954 [6].
International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO) was founded
in 1995. IFSO-based worldwide surveys on bariatric surgery have been published by the federation
in subsequent years. The first global survey of IFSO was reported by Scopinaro in 1998 [6]. After
which Buchwald and Angrisani presented follow-up reports for 2003, 2008, 2011and 2013 [4,7-9].
While previous reports were mostly based on estimated numbers and e-mail surveys; recent reports
reflect registries of IFSO-member national societies and provide more accurate information as First
IFSO Global Registry Report 2014 [10].
Scientific publishing is a reliable way of sharing an experience with other researchers and
practitioners. Analysis of these scientific publications is also a
valuable marker of scientific activity for researchers, institutes and
even countries.
Bibliometric analysis is a tool for quantitatively analyzing the
characteristics of publications in any field of research. Since Garfield
published first bibliometric study in the 1970s more articles have
appeared in different general and specialty journals [11-14].
The Science Citation Index was introduced in 1961 as a tool
for bibliographic retrieval, and it provides a large database for the
analysis of journals and publications. The Thomson Reuters Web of
ScienceTM Core Collection (WoS) is a software application that can be
used for analyzing scientific papers indexed in the Science Citation
Index Expanded (SCI-E) by various parameters [15].
The aim of this study is to evaluate trends of scientific productivity
comparing with practice on bariatric surgery of each IFSO member
societies over the last decade by using WoS bibliometric analysis.
Table 1
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted on June 25, 2015. The Thomson Reuters Web of ScienceTM Core Collection (WoS) was used to obtain numbers of bariatric surgery-related studies included in SCI-E in four certain time spans 2003-2004, 2008-2009, 2011-2012 and 2013- 2014 using the terms “bariatric surgery”, “metabolic surgery”, obesity surgery” and weight loss surgery” in topic search section. By using the “analyze” function of the software, we analyzed the number of publications for each IFSO member countries in those years. Time spans selected due to years of global IFSO reports, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2013 and the following years for possible publications from those years. Then each country’s publication rates per bariatric procedure (PPP) were calculated due to data provided by global reports of IFSO for each periods of time. Publication rates per bariatric surgeon (PPS) were also calculated for time spans of 2003-2004, 2008-2009, 2011- 2012 and publication rates per bariatric center (PPC) for 2013-2014 due to the same reports.
Results
Overall, the highest number of publications and procedures on
bariatric surgery were achieved by USA in all time spans of this study.
USA also has the largest volume of bariatric surgeons in 2003 and
2008. Then Brazil replaced the first rank for numbers of bariatric
surgeons in 2011 and bariatric centers in 2013. In 2013-2014, the
total number of bariatric surgery-related publications was 4,026
which were published by 56 IFSO member countries and the total
estimated number of bariatric procedure was 468,609 performed by
those countries. For PPP, Japan had been in the first place two times
for 2003-2004 and 2008-2009 by rates of 1.000 and 0.137 respectively.
Singapore and Spain had been in the first rank by rates of 0.115 and
0.878 in time spans of 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. For PPS, Turkey,
England, Germany had been in the first place by rates of 1.200, 1.800,
2.250 in time spans of 2003-2004, 2008-2009, 2011-2012 respectively.
For PPC in 2013-2014, Spain again ranked first by rate of 5.916.
2003-2004
The total number of bariatric surgery-related publications was
644, published by 26 IFSO member countries and the total estimated
number of bariatric procedure was 43,301 performed by these
countries. USA was in the first rank with 321 publications, followed
by Italy (n=51), Australia (n=29) and Brazil (n=29). USA and Canada
performed most procedures at 103,000. Nations declared performing
2,000 procedures or more annually were France (n=12,000), Belgium/
Luxembourg (n=6,000), Brazil (n=4,000), Italy (n=3,000), Australia/
New Zealand (n=2,750), Egypt (n=2,750), Mexico (n=2,500) and
Spain (n=2,000). For PPP, Japan was in the first place with rate of
0.100, followed by Poland (0.048), Turkey (0.040), Hungary (0.033),
and Mexico (0.028). The overall mean rate was 0.004 (Table 1).
The 26 countries declared a total of 2,839 bariatric surgeons, 850
in USA/Canada, 510 in Belgium/Luxembourg, 200 in Brazil, 200 in
Italy, 200 in France, 200 in Mexico, 160 in Spain and less than 150
for the rest of countries. For PPS, first five countries were Turkey,
Hungary, Greece, England and Sweden with rates of 1.200, 1.000,
0.875, 0.769 and 0.700, respectively. The overall mean PPS was 0.215.
2008-2009
In that period of time, 2,087 articles were originated from 36
IFSO member countries, led by USA (n=937) and followed by Italy
(n=133), Brazil (n=125) and England (n=108). Estimated total
number of procedure was 344,221. USA/Canada again performed
most procedures at 220,000 and followed by Brazil (n=25,000),
France (n=13,722), Mexico (n=13,500), Australia/New Zealand
(n=11,914) due to their declaration to IFSO in 2008. The overall mean
rate of PPP was 0,006. Japan, once again, was in the first place for PPP
with the rate of 0.137, followed by Serbia (0.100), Switzerland (0.056),
Germany (0.045) and Italy (0.027).
Through 4,680 bariatric surgeons were declared by 36 countries,
1,625 in USA/Canada, 700 in Brazil, 400 in Spain, 310 in France, 300
in Italy. Others had less than 300 bariatric surgeons in those years
(Table 2).
For PPS, the overall mean rate was 0,445 and first five ranked
countries were England, Germany, Switzerland, Poland and Austria
with rates of 1.800, 1.293, 1.200, 0.950 and 0.884, respectively.
2011-2012
The 2,844 articles were published by 42 IFSO member countries.
The highest contribution was from USA with 1,130 publications
followed by England (n=249), Brazil (n=168), Italy (n=152) and Spain
(n=144). Reported total number of procedures was 340,768 and was
dominated by USA/Canada at 101,645 followed by Brazil (n=65,000),
France (n=27,648), Mexico (n=19,600), Australia/New Zealand
(n=12,000) and England (n=10,000). Other countries performed less
than 10,000 bariatric procedures in 2011. For PPP, Singapore was in
the first place with the rate of 0,115 followed by Japan (0.094), Turkey
(0.039), Germany (0.033) and Taiwan (0.030). The overall mean PPP
was 0.008 (Table 3).
The total number of 6,705 bariatric surgeons was declared by
these 42 countries to IFSO and Brazil settled in the first rank for 2011
with 2,750 surgeons followed by USA/Canada (n=1,248), France
(n=310), Italy (n=272), Spain (n=259) and Mexico (n=200). Other
countries reported having less than 200 bariatric surgeons.
According to PPS, Switzerland dominated the rank with the rate of
9.600. It was followed by Germany, England, Taiwan and Netherlands
with the rates of 2.250, 2.075, 2.000 and 1.700, respectively. The
overall mean PPS was 0.424.
2013-2014
During that time span 4,026 papers were published by 54 IFSO
member nations or national groups. USA again was in the first
place with 1,440 publications followed by England (n=374), Italy
(n=236), Spain (n=213) and France (n=192). Through total 468,609
bariatric procedures were registered by these countries USA/Canada
was in the first rank with numbers of 154,276 followed by countries
performed more than 10,000 procedures in 2013 such as Brazil
(n=86,840), France (n=37,300), Argentina (n=30,378), Saudi Arabia
(n=13,194), Belgium (n=12,000), Israel (n=11,452), Australia/New
Zealand (n=10,467) and India (n=10,002). Overall mean PPP was
0.008 and Spain had the maximum PPP at 0.878 followed by Japan
(0.213), Serbia (0.133), Singapore (0.096) and England (0.067).
There were total 3,684 bariatric centers registered in these IFSO
members’ countries. The most of them located in Brazil with numbers
of 1,165 followed USA/Canada (n=708), France (n=380), India
(n=175), Germany (n=124), Colombia (n=120), England (n=112)
and China (n=102). Others reported less than 100 bariatric centers
(Table 4).
The overall mean PPC was 1,092 and Spain was in the first rank
with the rate of 5,916 followed by Netherlands, Singapore, England
and Italy with the rates of 5.176, 4.500, 3.339 and 3.064 respectively.
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Discussion
Afterwards IFSO was founded in 1995, the first global survey
of bariatric surgery related data from IFSO-member countries was
published in 1998 by the federation and then followed by reports in
2003, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014. Over the years numbers of member
societies of the federation had been increasing continuously, from 26
in 2003 to 60 in 2014.
This study has shown an increase in the number of publications
on bariatric surgery research over the last decade. We retrieved 644
papers for 2003-2004 and 4,026 papers for 2013-2014. Such increasing
on obesity-related publications in the literature was showed earlier
[16]. The highest number of publications on bariatric surgery was
achieved by USA in all time spans of this that study and followed
generally by the other developed countries. At the same time,
numbers of bariatric procedures, surgeons and centers have increased
much more rapidly than scientific productivity. In 2003-2004, 43,301
procedures performed by 1,989 surgeons and 340,768 procedures
performed by 6,705 surgeons in 2011-2012. There was reported
numbers of bariatric centers instead of numbers of bariatric surgeons
in IFSO report for 2013, so we were not able to compare the numbers
of surgeons for that year. USA, again, dominated lists of numbers of
procedures all the time and shared top places with Brazil for lists of
bariatric surgeons and centers in last years. But, surprisingly these
countries cannot keep their positions on the lists of PPP, PPS and
PPC. Here it is not easy to discuss about the real reason for that due
to lack of information where procedures mostly done, in private
hospitals or non-profit organizations such as university hospitals
or training hospitals where making scientific publications would be
more important. Unfortunately those numbers mostly depend on
estimations provided by IFSO member countries. Although North
and South America and Europe are the World’s leading areas in
practice and scientific production on bariatric surgery according to
IFSO reports.
Besides, most of the data provided in those reports were based on
“survey” systems at the beginning; recently it had been started using
“registries” as published in Bariatric Surgery Worldwide-2013 and
First IFSO Global Registry Report-2014 [9,10].
There are several limitations regarding to WoS software and
numbers are provided by IFSO in this study. The first is that WoS
includes publications only indexed by SCI-E. It is not possible to
evaluate other bariatric surgery related papers enclosed by other index
systems and as the list is updated regularly, the numerical changes
in results should be taken into consideration. Another handicap of
WoS is the uncertainty of countries where papers originated from.
Because of some studies are multicentric from different countries,
these publications may be counted more than one time. Papers
was not separated into WoS-categories, research areas, document
types or languages in this study for the purpose of giving a general
information instead of detailed and complicated one. The limitation
of IFSO data is that it is mostly based on survey methodology for
estimated numbers by countries’ bariatric procedures, surgeons or
centers instead of exact numbers due to their registry reports.
Conclusion
We can roughly claim that global scientific productivity on bariatric surgery has not been increased in parallel increasing numbers of bariatric procedures and surgeons over the last decade. Publishing researches and experiences is the one of the most effective ways to resolve scientific controversial issues specially on developing medical areas as bariatric surgery. Our study should be a call that research efforts must be supported by governments or private institutions. Additionally, creating national registry systems is essential to collect more accurate data and improve the quality of researches.
References
- Bray GA. The Battle of the Bulge: A History of Obesity Research. Dorrance, Pittsburgh. 2007.
- Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014; 384: 766-781.
- Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011; 378: 804-814.
- Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013; 23: 427-436.
- Lomanto D, Lee WJ, Goel R, Lee JJ, Shabbir A, So JB, et al. Bariatric surgery in Asia in the last 5 years (2005-2009). Obes Surg. 2012; 22: 502-506.
- Scopinaro N. The IFSO and obesity surgery throughout the world. Obes Surg. 1998; 8: 3–8.
- Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004; 14: 1157–1164.
- Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009; 19: 1605-1611.
- Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 1822-1832.
- First IFSO Global Registry Report. International federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders. Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd. 2014.
- Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972; 178: 471-479.
- Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987; 257: 52-59.
- Ahmad SS, Ahmad SS, Kohl S, Ahmad S, Ahmed AR. The hundred most cited articles in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 900-909.
- Bas K, Dayangac M, Yaprak O, Yuzer Y, Tokat Y. International collaboration of Turkey in liver transplantation research: a bibliometric analysis. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43: 3796-3801.
- Bas KK, Gunay LM, Besim H. Turkey's evaluation in kidney transplantation research. Exp Clin Transplant. 2011; 9: 319-322.
- Vioque J, Ramos JM, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, García-de-la-Hera M. A bibliometric study of scientific literature on obesity research in PubMed (1988-2007). Obes Rev. 2010; 11: 603-611.