Review Article
Twin Pregnancy Gestational Length Prolongation and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Reduction by Cervical Pessary with or without Vaginal Progesterone
Nwanodi OB*
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Surgery, A.T.Still University, USA
*Corresponding author: Oroma B. Nwanodi, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Surgery, College of Graduate Health Studies, A.T. Still University, 5850 Still Circle, Mesa AZ 85206, USA
Published: 15 Jul, 2016
Cite this article as: Nwanodi OB. Twin Pregnancy, Gestational Length Prolongation and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality, Reduction by Cervical Pessary with or without Vaginal Progesterone. Clin Surg. 2016; 1: 1041.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this mini review is to elucidate if cervical pessary, with or without progesterone is applicable to twin pregnancies. One-quarter of preterm births (PTB) are twin
pregnancies. Cervical cerclage, progesterone, and cervical pessary decrease the PTB incidence in
singleton pregnancies. Retrospective cohorts suggest that cervical cerclage is not harmful, and is
possibly beneficial in twin pregnancies, whereas meta-analysis found cervical cerclage harmful in
twin pregnancies.
Methods: Three significant articles from January to April, 2016 were selected for evidence-based
practice review. Hand search was performed as needed to complete the subject background.
Results: An American retrospective case-control study suggests that the Arabin cervical pessary
with vaginal progesterone reduces twin pregnancy PTB at <34 weeks estimated gestational age
(EGA), to 23.8% from 44.4% for controls. The mean cervical length was ≤1 mm at 25 weeks mean
EGA. A European multicenter randomized control trial (RCT) reduced PTB at < 34 weeks EGA,
from 40.9% in controls to 17.6% in Arabin pessary patients, p=.002. However, an international
RCT found equivalent PTB rates at <34 weeks EGA, 13.6% in Arabin pessary patients and 12.9%
in controls, accompanied by similar neonatal morbidity and mortality, and similar proportions of
newborn birth weight <2,500 grams.
Conclusion: The Arabin cervical pessary with, or without vaginal progesterone may be most
beneficial in twin pregnancies with cervical length ≤11 mm. Further RCT are needed to clarify which
PTB prevention modalities are most beneficial in twin pregnancy. Twin Pregnancy Gestational
Length Prolongation and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Reduction by Cervical Pessary with or
Without Vaginal Progesterone Twin pregnancies lead to 25% of preterm births (PTB), but are 1.5%
of all pregnancies [1]. The twin pregnancy gestational age-based PTB rate can be 5 to 10 times that
of singleton pregnancies [2]. The increased risk of PTB in twin pregnancies, in turn, proportionally
raises perinatal morbidity and mortality compared to that of singleton pregnancies [3]. Twin
pregnancies’ rising incidence from 19.8 to 33.1 per 1,000 births from 1980 to 2012 compounds the
incidence of perinatal morbidity and mortality attributed to twin, not singleton pregnancies [4].
Three mechanisms exist to reduce PTB in singleton pregnancies: Cervical cerclage, progesterone,
and cervical pessary Of these, it is possible that only cervical pessary with or without
progesterone prevents PTB in twin pregnancies.
Keywords: Twin pregnancy; Neonatal morbidity; Cervical pessary; Vaginal progesterone
Mechanisms to Prevent Preterm Birth
Cervical cerclage
Cervical cerclage mechanically closes the cervix. Cervical cerclage is the gold standard
prophylaxis for recurrent PTB in singleton pregnancies [3,5]. Cervical cerclage halves the singleton
PTB rate in women with three or more PTB or second-trimester spontaneous abortions from
32% to 15%, p=.02 [6]. Cervical cerclage placed in singleton pregnancies with cervical length
(CL) <25 mm at 16 to 22 6/7 weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) reduces birth at less than
37 weeks (p = .01), birth at less than 24 weeks (p=.03), and perinatal mortality (p=.01), when
there is a history of one or more PTB [6]. While retrospective cohorts suggest cervical cerclage may
clinically and statistically significantly reduce twin pregnancy PTB rate and neonatal morbidity and
mortality, no benefit is seen from rescue cerclage [7-9]. The PTB increased two fold in randomized
controlled trial (RCT) subgroup meta-analysis of twin pregnancy
cervical cerclage. Therefore, twin pregnancy cervical cerclage is
discouraged [7].
Progesterone
Progesterone’s myometrial relaxation is associated with cervical
ripening prevention, in turn preventing cervical dilation and fetal
delivery [2]. Weekly 17-hydroxyprogesterone, 250 μg injection,
reduces singleton pregnancy PTB in women with a previous PTB
by one-third [5,6-10]. When treating singleton active preterm labor,
twice weekly 17-hydroxyprogesterone, 341 μg injections reduce PTB,
odds ratio (OR) = .15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = .04 to .58 [2].
Vaginal progesterone, 90 mg/d of an 8% gel, equivalent to 200 mg
daily, reduces early preterm birth (p = .014), neonatal intensive care
admissions (NICU; p = .016), and length of NICU stay (p = .013), in
women with previous PTB and singleton pregnancy with a CL < 15
mm [2].
Cervical pessary
In the United States, the introduction of patented
17-hydroxyprogesterone priced at USD 1,440 per weekly dose, and
attempted removal of compounded 17-hydroxyprogesterone costing
USD 15 per weekly dose from the marketplace, resulted the use of in
infertility formulation vaginal progesterone and urogenital prolapse
pessaries or pessaries designed to treat cervical incompetence as
alternative PTB prophylaxis [5-11,12]. Cervical pessary efficacy shows
biologically plausible analogy [13]. The cervical pessary is designed
to keep the cervix elongated and closed, similar to cervical cerclages’
purse string like cervical closure. Initially shown by the Bakelite
ring in 1959, like cerclages, cervical pessaries mechanically close the
cervix, elevating the fetal head off the cervix [14]. The Hodge and
Smith lever pessaries were also used successfully to prevent singleton
PTB [14,15]. Subsequently, the bulkier Hamann/Jorde and MayerRing
pessaries were used. Thereafter, the incontinence dish pessary
like Arabin-cerclage pessary has been used to prevent singleton PTB
[14-16,17]. Simultaneously, Hodge pessaries were used with tocolytics
to prevent multiple gestations PTB [14].
In singleton pregnancies with CL ≤ 25 mm, cervical cerclage,
cervical pessary, and vaginal progesterone have equal efficacy [18].
The Pro TWIN trial suggests that cervical pessary can prevent PTB in
twin pregnancies with short CL [19]. However, cervical cerclage is not
currently recommended for multiple gestation PTB prevention, and is
the most invasive of the three PTB prevention options [7]. Therefore,
this mini review seeks to determine if cervical pessary or cervical
pessary with vaginal progesterone, compared to no intervention, can
reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and twin pregnancy PTB at
less than 34 weeks EGA.
Methods
In 2016, two multicenter RCTs, each notated as a report of major
impact, were published [1-4]. Also in 2016, a retrospective casecontrol
study on twin pregnancy PTB prevention was found worthy of
editorial [19,20]. These three studies were selected for evidence-based
practice (EBP) mini review. Hand search was performed as needed to
provide the milieu for these works and the EBP consideration.
Results
Cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with
twin gestation and sonographic short cervix: a multicenter
randomized controlled trial (pecep-twins)
Five Spanish hospitals were trial sites for this registered,
prospective, un-blinded RCT [4]. Blinding a pessary trial is
impossible as inert, placebo pessaries are non-existent. Patients with
anatomically and physiologically normal twin pregnancies and CL ≤
25 mm at the second trimester ultrasound (18 to 22 weeks EGA) were
eligible. Patients with prior cervical conization or who had already
received a cervical cerclage in the current pregnancy, and patients
with complicated pregnancies such as vaginal bleeding or abnormal
placentation were excluded [4]. Cervical length measurement was
standardized and centrally reviewed. From January 2011 through July
2014, 2,287 twin pregnancies were scanned, of which 154 had CL ≤
25 mm. The included 137 pregnancies were randomized by computer
generated variable blocks of 2 to 4 to pessary or no treatment control
in a 1:1 ratio, resulting in 68 pessary and 66 expectant management
patients. Three patients lost to follow-up were not included in analyses
[4]. A standard 65 x 25 x 32 mm Arabin pessary was used, except for
patients intolerant of this pessary, who then received a pessary fitting
[4,21]. Both groups were demographically and obstetrically similar at
study start. The groups received otherwise identical obstetric care [4].
The primary outcome, PTB at less than 34 weeks EGA, occurred in
12 (17.6%) pessary and 27 (40.9%) control patients, p = .002, relative
risk (RR) .43, 95% CI .24 to .78 [4]. This is a 2.3 fold reduction in
PTB. Birth weight < 2,500 grams occurred more often in the control
group (62 cases) than the pessary group (47 cases), p = .01, RR .72,
95% CI .54 to .97. Composite neonatal morbidity was not statistically
different between groups, despite two fetal deaths in the control group,
whereas the pessary group had neither fetal nor neonatal deaths. All
patients in the pessary group had vaginal discharge, a known adverse
effect of pessary use [4-22].
A potentially comparable singleton pregnancy cerclage pessary
trial was limited by possible selection bias as about ehalf of eligible
patients choose not to enroll in the trial [23]. Arguably underpowered,
and stopped early due to slow accrual, this singleton pregnancy trial
achieved a 20.7% singleton pregnancy PTB rate at less than 34 weeks
EGA, which is comparable to that achieved by the PECEP-Twins
trial [4-11-23]. Although multiple pregnancies normally deliver
earlier than singleton pregnancies, this suggests that while the design
and methods of the PECEP-Twins trial appear appropriate, bias,
chance, or confounding may be present [4]. However, based on the
PECEP-Twins trial, a pessary should be offered to patients with twin
pregnancy and CL ≤ 25 mm on the second trimester ultrasound. A
44% reduction in twin pregnancy PTB before 34 weeks EGA, and
a 25% reduction in birth weights < than 2,500 grams are worth
enduring vaginal discharge for at most 18-22 weeks and the up to
USD 125 cost of a pessary [24].
Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm
birth in unselected twin pregnancies: A randomized
controlled trial
Cervical pessary placement in twin pregnancies of unknown
cervical length was the intervention and no treatment was the control
in this 23 hospital, international, registered RCT [1]. Patients with
anatomically normal twin pregnancies on second trimester ultrasound
from August 2008 through May 2011 were eligible. Exclusion criteria
were consistent with the PECEP-Twins trial [4]. From 2,107 eligible
patients, 1,180 were randomized to groups, 3 were lost to followup.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to Arabin cervical pessary or no
treatment, via a random-number list instead of blocks, resulting in
590 patients in each group. Both groups were demographically and
obstetrically similar at study start. The groups received identical
obstetric care [1].
Intention to treat analysis was performed, which is important
as 31 pessaries were removed early on patient demand. The primary
outcome, PTB at less than 34 weeks EGA, occurred in 80 (13.6%)
pessary and 76 (12.9%) control patients, RR 1.054, 95% CI .899 to
1.051. Birth weight < 2,500 grams occurred similarly in each group,
RR .972, 95% CI .54 to .97 [1]. Neonatal morbidity and mortality was
similar in the study groups. Post hoc analysis of 214 patients with
CL ≤ 25 mm did not show any significant differences with PTB at
< 34 weeks occurring in 33 of 106 (31.1%) pessary patients and 28
of 108 (25.9%) expectant management patients. Selection bias may
have occurred as almost half of the eligible patients choose not to
participate [1].
Lack of standardized training in cervical pessary insertion may
be a study weakness. Blinded, centralized computer randomization,
standardized ultrasounds, and adherence to protocol are study
strengths. The post hoc analysis for patients with CL ≤ 25 mm is
inconsistent with findings in the literature [1]. Based on this study,
cervical pessary would not be recommended for all patients with twin
pregnancies.
Cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in twin
pregnancies with a short cervix
An electronic health record search to review anatomically normal
twin pregnancies at 28 weeks EGA or less with CL ≤ 20 mm that did
not receive a cervical cerclage formed the basis of this retrospective
case control study [19]. Three controls were selected based on EGA
and CL for each intervention case. Lack of controls with anatomically
normal fetuses and without cervical cerclage led to exclusion of an
intervention patient [19]. The study comprised 21 cases with Arabin
cervical pessaries and vaginal progesterone from 2013 to 2015, and 63
controls who received vaginal progesterone from 2005 to 2013. Cases
and controls received identical obstetric care [19].
Consistent with the preceding studies, blinding could not
occur [1-4-19]. Other than increased monochorionicity and in-vitro
fertilization pregnancies in the intervention group, the groups were
demographically and obstetrically similar. Regression analysis and
adjusted p values adjusted for these confounders. Due to the mean
CL of 10-11 mm, except for subgroup analysis, this study population
is different from the preceding studies [1-4-19]. PTB at < 34 weeks
EGA was clinically but not statistically significantly different between
groups, 23.8% for cases and 44.4% for controls, adjusted p = .1 [19].
Smaller twins’ weights were significantly less, adjusted p = .024, and
composite morbidity and mortality were significantly worse, adjusted
p = .04 in the control group [19]. Control outcomes could have been
adversely affected by obstetric and neonatal standard of care changes
from 2005 to 2015, and the control longer follow-up time, permitting
greater incidence of adverse outcomes. Improvements in obstetric
and neonatal care, including improved use of antenatal steroids for
fetal lung maturity, assisted ventilation, neonatal intensive care,
surfactant, and prenatal multivitamin formulation may have affected
the outcomes from 2005 to 2015 [25]. Improved obstetric and
prenatal care may be reflected in improved periviable and extremely
low birth weight newborn survival in Australia from 1979 - 1997 and
the United Kingdom from 1995 - 2006 [25].
A cohort study would be an appropriate method to answer
the question, whether cervical pessary with vaginal progesterone
is more effective than vaginal progesterone alone to prevent PTB
in twin pregnancy, if the cases and controls received interventions
simultaneously not sequentially. Vaginal progesterone and cervical
pessary can be offered in clinical practice, as an association between
improved neonatal outcomes and cervical pessary use has been shown
[19]. However, confounding by improved obstetric and neonatal
care, and reduced adverse outcome reporting and documentation
within shorter follow-up periods for intervention participants cannot
be excluded.
Conclusion
The quality of the available evidence and outcomes are variable. The results from these studies do not fit with each other [1-4-19]. Direct comparison can be made between PECEP-Twins trial and the International RCT post hoc analysis, but, the retrospective case-control study is not directly comparable to either preceding study [1-4-19]. The retrospective case control study used a later baseline EGA (28 weeks instead of 18-22 weeks) for intervention initiation, and a shorter CL (≤20 mm instead of ≤ 25 mm) [19]. Despite these negative handicapping differences, the retrospective case control study pessary with vaginal progesterone arm achieved comparable reductions in PTB at ≤34 weeks EGA to the PECEPTwins trial [4,19]. The Arabin cervical pessary with, or without vaginal progesterone may be most beneficial in twin pregnancies with CL ≤11 mm, but still useful in twin pregnancies with CL ≤25 mm on second trimester anatomy ultrasound from 18 - 28 weeks EGA. Future studies could evaluate cervical pessary efficacy with and without vaginal progesterone, initiated later than 22 weeks EGA at a range of CLs ≤ 25 mm for prevention of PTB before 34 weeks EGA in twin pregnancy. Such studies may reveal a time sequence response and a CL association [13]. International RCT of cervical pessary in twin pregnancies with CL ≤25 mm at 18-22 weeks EGA are needed to validate or refute the PECEP-Twins trial and the International RCT post hoc analysis [1,4].
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Thomas Colletti, DHSc., of A.T.Still University in Mesa, Arizona for editorial and reviewing assistance. This mini review is based on coursework previously presented to the College of Graduate Health Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Health Sciences Degree A.T.Still University.
References
- Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, de Paco Matallana C, Plasencia, W, Molina FS, et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: e1-e9.
- da Fonseca EB, Damião R, Nicholaides K. Prevention of preterm birth based on short cervix: progesterone. Semin Perinatol. 2009; 33: 334-337.
- Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, Spong CY, Howson CP, Cairns-Smith S, et al. Preventing preterm births: Analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. The Lancet. 2013; 381: 223-234.
- Goya M, de la Calle M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, Rodó C, Muñoz B, et al. Cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with twin gestation and sonographic short cervix: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (PECEP-Twins). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 145-152.
- Newnham JP, Dickinson JE, Hart RJ, Pennell CE, Arrese CA, Keelan JA. Strategies to prevent preterm birth. Frontiers in Immunology. 2014; 5: 584.
- Mancuso MS, Owen J. Prevention of preterm birth based on a short cervix: cerclage. Semin Perinatol. 2009; 33: 325-333.
- Houlihan C, Poon LC, Ciarlo M, Kim E, Guzman ER, Nicolaides KH. Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestations with short cervix: a retrospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obst Gyn. 2016.
- Roman A, Rochelson B, Martinelli P, Saccone G, Harris K, Zork N, et al. Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016.
- Soliman N, Kuret V, Metcalfe A, Thomas S. 423: Rescue cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies for the prevention of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: S233.
- Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo, A, Tabor A, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: A systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 124. e1-124.e19.
- Liem S, van Pampus MG, Mol BWJ, Bekedam DJ. Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2013.
- Patel Y, Rumore MM. Hydroxyprogesterone caproate injection (Makena) one year later: To compound or not to compound that is the question. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2012; 37: 405–411.
- Höfler M. The Bradford Hill considerations on causality: A counterfactual perspective. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. 2005; 2: 11.
- Newcomer J. Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000; 55: 443-448.
- Oster S, Javert CT. Treatment of the incompetent cervix with the Hodge pessary. Obstet Gynecol. 1966; 28: 206-208.
- Dharan VB, Ludmir J. Alternative treatment for a short cervix: the cervical pessary. Semin Perinatol. 2009; 33: 338-342.
- Sieroszewski P, Jasiński A, Perenc M, Banach R, Oszukowski P. The Arabin pessary for the treatment of threatened mid-trimester miscarriage or premature labour and miscarriage: a case series. The Journal of MaternalFetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2009; 22: 469-472.
- Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, Sharp AN, Szychowski JM, Goya M. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obst Gyn. 2013; 4: 146-151.
- Fox NS, Gupta S, Lam-Rachlin J, Rebarber A, Klauser CK, Saltzman DH. Cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: 625-630.
- Rouse DJ. Pessary for Twins: If Ever, Not Yet. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127: 623-624.
- Arabin Products. Cervical incompetence during pregnancy: Cerclage pessary. Dr. Arabin GmbH & Co. KG.
- Collins S, Beigi R, Mellen C, O’Sullivan D, Tulikangas P. The effect of pessaries on the vaginal microenvironment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 60.e1-60.e6.
- Hui SY, Chor CM, Lau TK, Lao TT, Leung TY. Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20 to 24 weeks: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinat. 2013; 30: 283-288.
- Guardian Home Medical Supply. Pessary Search. 2015.
- McGoldrick E, Brown J, Middleton P, McKinlay CJ, Haas DM, Crowther CA. Antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation: an overview of Cochrane reviews. The Cochrane Library. 2016.