Major Scope

  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Gynecologic Oncology
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine
  •  Neonatal Surgery
  •  Prenatal Surgery
  •  Trauma Surgery
  •  Surgical Intensivists, Specializing In Critical Care Patients
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Congenital Cardiac Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery-Integrated
  •  Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2024;9(1):3707.Research Article | Open Access

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques

Oberhammer L, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, Oswald D and Mitterberger MJ

Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Austria

*Correspondance to: Lukas Oberhammer 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3707

Abstract

Purpose: To compare oncological, peri-, and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted with those of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with low- or moderate-complexity renal tumors (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring) were randomized in a single-blind manner and operated on by the robotassisted (n=13) or laparoscopic (n=17) approach. The primary outcome was oncological safety, based on the Residual tumor (R) classification. Secondary outcome parameters were perioperative and postoperative results. The open-source R statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two surgical methods (p=0.58). Operating time (p=0.105), ischemia time (p=0.884), overall length of hospital stay (p=0.664), postoperative pain, and preoperative and in-hospital renal function scores were similar. Creatinine levels differed significantly six months postoperatively (robotic: 0.9 mg/dl vs. laparoscopic: 1.1 mg/ dl; p=0.014). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the laparoscopic group (400 ml vs. 168 ml; p=0.028), which was also reflected in postoperative hemoglobin levels (13.8 mg/dl vs. 12.5 mg/dl; p=0.012). Peri- or post-operative complications did not differ significantly (p=0.355). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly more frequent complications in patients with moderatecomplexity tumors treated by laparoscopic surgery (p=0.021). Conclusion: The oncological outcome in regard to the R status was similar in both groups. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative renal function, and complications all benefited from robotassisted surgery. Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03900364; 03/04/2019).

Keywords

Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Nephrometry score

Cite the article

Oberhammer L, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques. Clin Surg. 2024; 9: 3707.

Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 2.395**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
  • NLM ID: 101702548

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Quantitative Evaluation of Subzygomatic Depression Secondary to Single Longitudinal Masseter Hypertrophy with Botulinum Toxin A Injection Using Three-dimensional Scanning Technique
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
A Nerve Sparing Procedure for Posterior Access Thoracolumbar Fracture Surgery
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...