
Major Scope
- Colon and Rectal Surgery
- General Surgery
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Plastic Surgery
- Neurological Surgery
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine
- Neonatal Surgery
- Prenatal Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Surgical Intensivists, Specializing In Critical Care Patients
- Thoracic Surgery
- Congenital Cardiac Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery-Integrated
- Vascular Surgery
Abstract
Citation: Clin Surg. 2024;9(1):3707.Research Article | Open Access
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques
Oberhammer L, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, Oswald D and Mitterberger MJ
Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Austria
*Correspondance to: Lukas Oberhammer
PDF Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3707
Abstract
Purpose: To compare oncological, peri-, and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted with those of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with low- or moderate-complexity renal tumors (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring) were randomized in a single-blind manner and operated on by the robotassisted (n=13) or laparoscopic (n=17) approach. The primary outcome was oncological safety, based on the Residual tumor (R) classification. Secondary outcome parameters were perioperative and postoperative results. The open-source R statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two surgical methods (p=0.58). Operating time (p=0.105), ischemia time (p=0.884), overall length of hospital stay (p=0.664), postoperative pain, and preoperative and in-hospital renal function scores were similar. Creatinine levels differed significantly six months postoperatively (robotic: 0.9 mg/dl vs. laparoscopic: 1.1 mg/ dl; p=0.014). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the laparoscopic group (400 ml vs. 168 ml; p=0.028), which was also reflected in postoperative hemoglobin levels (13.8 mg/dl vs. 12.5 mg/dl; p=0.012). Peri- or post-operative complications did not differ significantly (p=0.355). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly more frequent complications in patients with moderatecomplexity tumors treated by laparoscopic surgery (p=0.021). Conclusion: The oncological outcome in regard to the R status was similar in both groups. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative renal function, and complications all benefited from robotassisted surgery. Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03900364; 03/04/2019).
Keywords
Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Nephrometry score
Cite the article
Oberhammer L, Lusuardi L, Kunit T, Griessner H, Pallauf M, Eiben C, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques. Clin Surg. 2024; 9: 3707.
Journal Basic Info
- Impact Factor: 2.395**
- H-Index: 8
- ISSN: 2474-1647
- DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
- NLM ID: 101702548