Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Surgical Oncology
  •  Pediatric Surgery
  •  Gastroenterological Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Gynecological Surgery
  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery


Citation: Clin Surg. 2023;8(1):3641.Research Article | Open Access

Practices in Neurosurgical Anesthesia – A Survey among Austrian Centers

Fantin R1*#, Kerbler L1#, Michels N1, Graf-Huijsmans S1, Frisch C1, Illievich U2, Mirth C3, Klein KU4 and Jochberger S1

1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
2Department of Neuroanesthesia and Intensive Care, Kepler University Hospital, Austria
3Clinical Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital, St. Pölten, Austria
4Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Austria #Both authors contributed equally to this work.

*Correspondance to: Raffaella Fantin 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3641


Introduction: The discipline of neuroanesthesia provides vital services to facilitate neurosurgery and postoperative intensive care, and is a main contributor to patient outcomes. Even though individual anesthetic interventions are regularly subject to scientific scrutiny, no exhaustive systemic overview of adopted methods in different Austrian neurosurgical centers has been delivered to date. In order to establish a cross-sectional overview of practice among eleven Austrian neurosurgical centers, we conducted a digital survey, which included 72 questions in four sections, namely general features of participating centers, characteristics of neuroanesthesia for cranial as well as spinal surgery, and peculiarities of neurosurgical intensive care. Methods: We carried out a 72-item, cross-sectional online questionnaire which allowed for different types of answers upon invitation via e-mail. After conclusion of the survey and screening of given answers, we applied descriptive statistics in order to present our dataset in tabular and free-text form. Results: At 100% response rate, we were able to compile an exhaustive overview of neuroanesthesia among all Austrian neurosurgical centers. Conclusion: We demonstrate and discuss specific areas of interest, especially in areas in which conclusive scientific evidence has not been delivered to date. Commonalities and differences of standard neuroanesthetic practice, available diagnostic and therapeutic resources and organizational specifics across our sample were identified.


Cite the article

Fantin R, Kerbler L, Michels N, Graf- Huijsmans S, Frisch C, Illievich U, et al. Practices in Neurosurgical Anesthesia – A Survey among Austrian Centers. Clin Surg. 2023; 8: 3641..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Plant-Based Natural Products for Breast Cancer Prevention: A South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Countries Perspective
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Could Collaboration between Emergency Department Clinicians and Dentists More Effectively Treat Patients with Acute Dental Pain?
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...