Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Bariatric Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Transplant Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2022;7(1):3508.Research Article | Open Access

Impact of Portal Vein Embolization on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases

Yaacov Goykhman1#, Saeed Sirhan2#, Alex Barenboim2, Isaac Kori3, Sharon Peles-Avraham4, Guy Lahat2, Michal Shimonovich2, Joseph M Klausner2, Menahem Ben-Haim5# and Nir Lubezky1*#

1Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Israel
2Division of Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
3Unit of Invasive Radiology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
4Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
5Department of Surgery, Shaarey Zedek Medical Center, Israel
#These authors contributed equally to this work

*Correspondance to: Nir Lubezky 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3508

Abstract

Background: Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) is used to increase Future Liver Remnant (FLR) volume before major liver resection. There is concern that PVE may stimulate cancer growth and jeopardize long-term outcome in patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM). We compared survival outcomes of patients with CRLM who underwent major liver resection without PVE. Methods: Data of patients undergoing major liver resection for CRLM between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, Overall Survival (OS), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) were compared between patients who underwent major liver resection w/wo PVE. Groups with comparable oncologic risk factors (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC] risk score) were compared. Results: Forty-one of the 53 patients who underwent PVE underwent curative liver resection, and 12 patients did not due to disease progression. Seventy-seven patients underwent major liver resection without preoperative PVE. Subgroup survival analyses based on the MSKCC score (MSCKCC 0-1; 2-3; 4-5) revealed a median DFS for PVE vs. non-PVE of 19 vs. 34 months (P=0.02), 11 vs. 15 (P=ns), and 7 vs. 13 (P=ns). The respective median OS of the groups was 90 vs. 93 months, 36 vs. 46, and 52 vs. 33 (P=ns for all). PVE had no influence on DFS or OS (multivariate COX regression analyses). Conclusion: PVE in patients with inadequate FLR enables safe resection. Multivariable analysis demonstrates that PVE does not result in decreased OS and DFS, thus supporting its long-term oncologic safety.

Keywords

Cite the article

Goykhman Y, Sirhan S, Barenboim A, Kori I, Peles-Avraham S, Lahat G, et al. Impact of Portal Vein Embolization on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases. Clin Surg. 2022; 7: 3508..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Subpedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Treatment of Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Kyphosis
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
The Role Exosomes Played on Pancreatic Cancer
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...