Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Transplant Surgery
  •  Plastic Surgery


Citation: Clin Surg. 2020;5(1):2909.Research Article | Open Access

Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases

Iris H Wei1*, Emmanouil P Pappou1, J Joshua Smith1, Maria Widmar1, Garrett M Nash1, Martin R Weiser1, Philip B Paty1, Jose G Guillem1, Anoushka Afonso2 and Julio Garcia-Aguilar1

1Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA
2Department of Anesthesiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA

*Correspondance to: Iris H Wei 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2909


Aim: In 2014, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was identified as an outlier for increased Length of Stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery. We subsequently implemented a comprehensive Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) program in January 2016, which is continually monitored to target areas for improvement. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a newly established ERAS program in a high-volume colorectal center over time. Method: This was a retrospective cohort study, comparing 3000 sequential cancer patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery before and after ERAS implementation. Patients were divided into three groups (Pre-, Early, and Late ERAS). Adherence to ERAS process measures and outcomes (LOS, complications, and 30-day readmission) were compared among the three time periods. Results: Adherence to ERAS metrics significantly increased over time, from a median of 25% Pre- ERAS to 67% Early and 75% Late ERAS (p<0.0001). Mean LOS decreased from 5.2 days Pre-ERAS to 4.5 Early and 4.0 Late ERAS (p<0.0001). There were no differences in rates of complications or readmissions, and patients with shorter LOS had lower readmission rates. With ERAS, the readmission rate was 4.4% for patients discharged within 3 days, vs. >10% for LOS ≥ 5 days (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Initiation of an ERAS program at a high-volume colorectal center was associated with decreased LOS, without increasing morbidity. Increased ERAS adherence was associated with a further decrease in LOS. Multidisciplinary monitoring to promote protocol adherence is necessary for maintaining a safe and effective ERAS program.


Cite the article

Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Widmar M, Nash GM, Weiser MR, et al. Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases. Clin Surg. 2020; 5: 2909..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
RAF Kinase Inhibitory Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Profiles in Oral Cancers
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Massive Preperitoneal Hematoma after Open Hernia Repair with UltraPro Hernia System
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Ultra-Short-Wave Therapy Combined with Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation Modulates the Inflammatory Response after Spinal Cord Injury
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...