Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Transplant Surgery
  •  Cardiovascular Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Gastroenterological Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2019;4(1):2658.Research Article | Open Access

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Ruptured Aneurysms: Stent-Assisted Coiling vs. Single Coiling

Jia L, Wang J, Zhang L, Ming LV and Yang X

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, China
These authors contributed equally to this work

*Correspondance to: Ming LV 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2658

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing endovascular treatment by Stent-Assisted Coiling (SAC) require dual antiplatelet therapy, which may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Therefore, SAC is controversial in Intracranial Ruptured Aneurysms (IRA). Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treating IRA with SAC versus single coiling. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 151 patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage resulting from IRA confirmed by digital subtraction angiography who underwent SAC or single coiling therapy in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2017. Results: There were 152 aneurysms in 151 patients; 64 aneurysms were treated with SAC, while 88 were treated with single coiling. Follow-up angiography showed that the complete occlusion rate in the SAC group was similar to that in the single coiling group (89.7% vs. 78.2%, respectively; P=0.08). In addition, the total perioperative complication rate in the SAC group was similar to that in the single coiling group (23.4% vs. 19.5%, respectively; P=0.56). During follow-up, the SAC group had a similar incidence of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) compared with the single coiling group (88.3% vs. 83.3%, respectively; P=0.41). Conclusion: SAC may be as effective and safe as single coiling for IRA.

Keywords

Intracranial ruptured aneurysms; Stent-assisted coiling; Single coiling

Cite the article

Jia L, Wang J, Zhang L, Ming LV, Yang X. Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Ruptured Aneurysms: Stent-Assisted Coiling vs. Single Coiling. Clin Surg. 2019; 4: 2658.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
RAF Kinase Inhibitory Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Profiles in Oral Cancers
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Satisfactory Outcome with Low Activated Clotting Time (<150 Seconds) in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Site-Specific Response of Bone Tissue to Ovariectomy in a Rabbit Model
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...