Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2019;4(1):2327.Research Article | Open Access

Surgical Management of IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; A Systematic Review

Amalie Lambert Kristensen, Frank Vincenzo de Paoli, Morten Bendixen, Marianne Knap, Azza Ahmed Khalil and Thomas Decker Christensen

Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular Surgery and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
Department of Oncology and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

*Correspondance to: Thomas Decker Christensen 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2327

Abstract

Background: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) stage IIIA/N2 (cT1-3N2M0) represents a heterogenic group, and depending on the level of lymph node involvement, prognosis varies within this group. Optimal treatment is debated, and patients may have benefit from combined treatment modalities. The aim of this study was to assess the evidence regarding surgical treatment of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC diagnosed before commencement of treatment.Methods: A systematic literature search for Randomized, Controlled Trials (RCT) comparing various combinations of treatments with surgery. Extraction of relevant data was performed, including study characteristics, patient characteristics, quality of trials and survival outcomes.Results: Five RCT’s with a total of 1166 patients were included. Treatment modalities varied substantially. None of the included studies found a statistically significant improved median overall survival, and only one study found an improved progression free survival when patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Results, however indicates better locoregional control with surgery.Conclusion: Current clinical guidelines are not based on high-quality evidence. To assess the existing high-quality evidence on this subject, only RCT’s were included in this review. Results of statistical significance on survival are lacking, and studies show poor methodical quality. Based on the evidence available, surgery is not superior compared to other treatment modalities. Further subgroup analyses are needed, as evidence points toward surgery being beneficial for a subgroup of patients, possibly those with single-station N2 disease. RCT’s of high methodical quality are needed to determine optimal chemotherapy regimens, radiotherapy and concomitant surgical intervention.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer; Surgery; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy

Cite the article

Kristensen AL, de Paoli FV, Bendixen M, Knap M, Khalil AA, Christensen TD. Surgical Management of IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; A Systematic Review. Clin Surg. 2019; 4: 2327.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Automated Sagittal Craniosynostosis Classification from CT Images Using Transfer Learning
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Site-Specific Response of Bone Tissue to Ovariectomy in a Rabbit Model
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Comparison of Two Extended Interbody Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws vs. Traditional Pedicle Screws Combined with a Novel Domino System
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...