Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Cardiovascular Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Surgical Oncology
  •  Transplant Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):2164.Research Article | Open Access

Appendectomy versus Conservative Antibiotics Treatment for Non-Complicated Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hyun Kang, Yoo Shin Choi, Suk Won Seo, Geun Joo Choi and Seung Eun Lee

Department of Anesthesiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, South Korea
Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, South Korea

*Correspondance to: Seung Eun Lee 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2164

Abstract

Purpose: In this meta-analysis, we compared the safety and efficacy of antibiotic treatment with appendectomy for the primary treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials that compared antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The primary outcome measure was the initial treatment failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall treatment failure rate, length of primary hospital stay, time for sick leave, and cost.Results: In total, 1,480 patients from 6 randomized controlled trials (751 undergoing antibiotic treatment, 729 undergoing appendectomy) were included in the final analysis. Overall treatment efficacy in the antibiotic group was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.84; Pchi 2<0.001; I2=81.51%) versus 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.96; Pchi 2<0.001; I2=80.23%) in the appendectomy group. There were no differences with regard to overall treatment efficacy (Risk ratio (RR), 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; Pchi 2<0.001; I2=90.98%; NNT=6), complication rate (Risk ratio(RR), 1.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 5.05; Pchi 2=0.008; I2=71.21%; NNT=186), hospital stay (mean difference(MD), -0.05; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.55; Pchi 2<0.001; I2=98.24%), time for sick leave (MD, -4.36; 95% CI, -12.00 to 3.28; Pchi 2<0.001; I2=99.45%) and cost (MD, -12230.46; 95% CI, -17086.77 to -7374.15; Pchi 2=0.321; I2=0.00%).Conclusion: Antibiotic treatment is effective and safe as primary treatment for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Therefore, antibiotic treatment could be considered as an alternative option in the treatment of patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

Keywords

Acute appendicitis; Appendectomy; Antibiotic; Meta-analysis

Cite the article

Kang H, Choi YS, Seo SW, Choi GJ, Lee SE. Appendectomy versus Conservative Antibiotics Treatment for Non-Complicated Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 2164.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Automated Sagittal Craniosynostosis Classification from CT Images Using Transfer Learning
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Review of the Latest Methods in the Treatment of Epidermolysis Bullosa and Other Chronic Wounds, Development of Innovative Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Correlation between Characteristics of Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis of N1-N2 Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...