Major Scope

  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Gynecologic Oncology
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine
  •  Neonatal Surgery
  •  Prenatal Surgery
  •  Trauma Surgery
  •  Surgical Intensivists, Specializing In Critical Care Patients
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Congenital Cardiac Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery-Integrated
  •  Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):2122.Research Article | Open Access

Is Artificial Intelligence the Most Reliable Way to Predict Mortality After Liver Transplantation?

Marcos Bruna Esteban, Eva Montalvá, Antonio J. Serrano-López, Joan Vila-Francés, Javier Maupoey and Juan Vila J

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, General University Hospital of Valencia, Spain
University and Polytechnic Hospital of La Fe, Spain
Department of Data Analysis Laboratory, School of Engineering at the University of Valencia, Spain

*Correspondance to: Marcos Bruna Esteban 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2122

Abstract

Introduction: Graft allocation in Liver Transplantation (LT) should be based on the greatestsurvival benefit to the patients awaiting transplantation. This study developed a predictive model to determine recipient mortality 1 year after LT.Materials and
Methods:
We developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Logistic Regression (LR) models and compared their results with the Balance of Risk (BAR), Survival Outcomes Following Transplantation (SOFT), and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. The Development Group used to create the predictive models included 1235 valid cases, while 200 consecutive transplant patients since January 2009 were included in the Generalization Group for internal validation.Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the ANN model (0.82) was higher than that of the LR model (0.68). For the Generalization Group, the MELD, SOFT, and BAR scores had AUCs of 0.56, 0.57, and 0.62, respectively. The ANN model had a significantly higher AUC than that of each score (MELD, p=0.005; SOFT, p=0.009; BAR, p=0.02).Conclusion: ANN model was superior to the LR model and other scales currently used to predict mortality during the first year after LT and to match a particular graft with potential recipients.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence; Liver Transplantation; Recipient Survival; Waitlist Management

Cite the article

Esteban MB, Montalv� E, Serrano-L�pez AJ, Vila-Franc�s J, Maupoey Jm Juan Vila J. Is Artificial Intelligence the Most Reliable Way to Predict Mortality After Liver Transplantation? Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 2122.

Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 2.395**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
  • NLM ID: 101702548

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Study on Risk Factors and Prognosis of Lymph Node Metastasis of Siewert II/III Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Does Trop2 Qualify as Prognostic Marker in Papillary RCC?
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...