Journal Basic Info
- Impact Factor: 2.395**
- H-Index: 8
- ISSN: 2474-1647
- DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
Major Scope
- Gynecological Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Obstetrics Surgery
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
- Plastic Surgery
- Breast Surgery
- Endocrine Surgery
Abstract
Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):1952.Research Article | Open Access
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Using the Extraperitoneal Approach in Japanese Men
Kiyoshi Takahara, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa, Masashi Nishino, Masahiro Ito, Masaru Hikichi, Kosuke Fukaya, Manabu Ichino, Naohiko Fukami, Hitomi Sasaki, Mamoru Kusaka and Ryoichi Shiroki
Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
*Correspondance to: Kiyoshi Takahara
PDF Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1952
Abstract
Background: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) has become a widely adopted procedure to treat localized Prostate Cancer (PCa). However, it is sometimes difficult to perform such a procedure using the typical Transperitoneal (TP) approach in those cases that have undergone prior abdominal operations. Herein, we performed RARP using the Extraperitoneal (EP) approach for Japanese PCa cases with prior abdominal operations to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes associated with this procedure.Material and
Methods: Seven hundred eighty-eight Japanese PCa cases underwent RARP from August 2009 to March 2017; 15 cases that were operated on using the EP approach comprised the study cohort.Results: The abdominal operations in the 15 cases were performed for the following reasons: three for nephrectomy, two for panperitonitis, two for appendectomy, and nine for other reasons, including overlap. There were no significant differences with respect to six factors (operation time, console time, estimated intraoperative blood loss volume, surgical margin positivity, postoperative catheterization time, and postoperative hospital length of stay) between the cases that underwent the procedure using the TP and EP approach, despite the total number of cases in each group being different.Conclusions: We propose that RARP could be safely performed using the EP approach in Japanese PCa cases that have had prior abdominal operations.
Keywords
Prostate cancer; RARP; Extraperitoneal approach
Cite the article
Takahara K, Yoshizawa A, Nishino M, Ito M, Hikichi M, Fukaya K, et al. Clinical Outcomes Associated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Using the Extraperitoneal Approach in Japanese Men. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 1952.