Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Gastroenterological Surgery
  •  Bariatric Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2018;3(1):1952.Research Article | Open Access

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Using the Extraperitoneal Approach in Japanese Men

Kiyoshi Takahara, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa, Masashi Nishino, Masahiro Ito, Masaru Hikichi, Kosuke Fukaya, Manabu Ichino, Naohiko Fukami, Hitomi Sasaki, Mamoru Kusaka and Ryoichi Shiroki

Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

*Correspondance to: Kiyoshi Takahara 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1952

Abstract

Background: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) has become a widely adopted procedure to treat localized Prostate Cancer (PCa). However, it is sometimes difficult to perform such a procedure using the typical Transperitoneal (TP) approach in those cases that have undergone prior abdominal operations. Herein, we performed RARP using the Extraperitoneal (EP) approach for Japanese PCa cases with prior abdominal operations to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes associated with this procedure.Material and
Methods: Seven hundred eighty-eight Japanese PCa cases underwent RARP from August 2009 to March 2017; 15 cases that were operated on using the EP approach comprised the study cohort.Results: The abdominal operations in the 15 cases were performed for the following reasons: three for nephrectomy, two for panperitonitis, two for appendectomy, and nine for other reasons, including overlap. There were no significant differences with respect to six factors (operation time, console time, estimated intraoperative blood loss volume, surgical margin positivity, postoperative catheterization time, and postoperative hospital length of stay) between the cases that underwent the procedure using the TP and EP approach, despite the total number of cases in each group being different.Conclusions: We propose that RARP could be safely performed using the EP approach in Japanese PCa cases that have had prior abdominal operations.

Keywords

Prostate cancer; RARP; Extraperitoneal approach

Cite the article

Takahara K, Yoshizawa A, Nishino M, Ito M, Hikichi M, Fukaya K, et al. Clinical Outcomes Associated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Using the Extraperitoneal Approach in Japanese Men. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 1952.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Clinical Effects of Using the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Approach on Postoperative Bariatric Surgery Status: A Review Study
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Decision Making for Surgical Approaches to Resection of Benign Presacral Tumors in Adult Women: A Case Series
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...