Case Report
The Extended Clitoral-U Suspension and Unhooding
Steven P Davison*, Kylie D Hayes and Gabrielle LaBove
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, USA
*Corresponding author: Steven P Davison, Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, USA
Published: 16 Feb, 2018
Cite this article as: Davison SP, Hayes KD, LaBove G. The
Extended Clitoral-U Suspension and
Unhooding. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 1916.
Abstract
Labiaplasty with clitoral unhooding is becoming a more common procedure. The authors discuss the extended clitoral-U suspension, and unhooding technique to address both the labia minora excess and clitoral hooding of the patient.
Introduction
As labiaplasty has become more main stream the labia minora reduction procedure has changed
from discussing the amputation technique versus the wedge technique to a more tailored approach
to each patient.
One of the a la carte additions to labia minora reduction has been the clitoral hood reduction.
This has been particularly successful as it addresses the visible tissue show of the clitoral prepuce in
the anterior labial commissure, a major concern for the patient [1]. Patients with significant clitoral
hooding often present with frustration with the forward standing view presentation of their labia
and clitoral hood in which three arches and two folds appear (Figure 1).
Case Presentation
Current techniques
Two main surgical techniques have addressed the clitoral unhooding. The first described by
Gary Alter removes a horizontal central cleft of tissue midshaft on the clitoral hood [2]. The next
technique, most effectively communicated by Hamori, reduces the overhang just dorsal to the
clitoral hood [3]. Neither of the techniques observes the time-aged plastic surgery trick of hiding
incisions at subunit transitions.
Technical Detail
We suggest that placing the suture line at the vaginal cleft rim and resecting the proximal onethird to one-half of the hood has considerable advantages. The clitoris can be suspended to the suspensory ligament of the pelvis with complete safety as the clitoral shaft originates from below the bone and the pudendal nerve branches are lateral to the tissue itself. The stitch is placed in the deep dermis of the resected hood without piercing the clitoral proper. The resection of tissue can be carried distally towards the base of the labia minora wedge incision as an extended U-shaped excision (Figure 2 and 3). This shortens the skin height from the minora/majora sulcus and reduces excess folds in the frenula of each side of the prepuce. The final incision line is placed in the minora sulcus extending all the way around to the anterior clitoral prepuce (Figure 4 and 5). As much as 1½ cm of skin can be excised and with it annoying hair follicles which were located on the hood. While the extended U technique has a longer incision than other clitoral unhooding techniques it is unperceivable at three months post-op due to the utilization of subunit transitions. The anterior displacement of the entire hood may require a modification to the wedge technique. In the extended central wedge, the anterior corner of the wedge is inset to the posterior corner with no tension; however, if the clitoral hood is pulled forward using the extended U technique a wider gap exists. To compensate, the posterior incision of the wedge is folded anteriorly at a T-junction closure. The T-junction eliminates all tension, maintains the closure in the sulcus, and secondarily shortens the height of the labia minora, which is often the patient’s presenting complaint. No more than 1 cm of T-junction closure is necessary and minimal dog ear tailoring is at the surgeon’s discretion (Figure 6 and 7).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Discussion and Conclusion
This technique is bespoke labiaplasty - it hides final closure in tissue transitions while minimizing anterior show and eliminating migrating hair follicles. Fundamentally, this is an expansion of an inverted T mastopexy where the lateral pillar is now the posterior commissure of the labia and is moved anteriorly. There is no compromise to blood supply of the posterior labial artery or pudendal artery and all suspension is clear of the dorsal nerve of the clitoris and pudendal nerve supply. The patients have been uniformly happy with no negative change in sensation; any reports of changes have been positive with regard to sexual function. Furthermore, the scars are unperceivable as early as their 3-month follow-up. The extended U technique of clitoral unhooding uniquely presents as a reduction of tissue while simultaneously lifting and suspending the tissues, giving the area a more youthful appearance.
References
- Hamori CA. Postoperative clitoral hood deformity after labiaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(7):1030-6.
- Alter GJ. Aesthetic labia minora and clitoral hood reduction using extended central wedge resection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1780-9.
- Hamori CA. Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia: labiaplasty and beyond. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):661-73.