Short Communication

Anatomical Parameters for Nipple Position in Males

Hassanpour SE1, Otaghvar HRA2*, Nasiri E3 and Shafiei M4
1Department of Plastic Surgery, 15 Khordad Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran
2Department of General Surgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Trauma & Injury Research Center, Iran
3Department of Nursing, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4Department of Surgery, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran


*Corresponding author: Otaghvar HRA, Department of General Surgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Resident of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Trauma & Injury Research Center of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Published: 22 Jan, 2018
Cite this article as: Hassanpour SE, Otaghvar HRA, Nasiri E, Shafiei M. Anatomical Parameters for Nipple Position in Males. Clin Surg. 2018; 3: 1871.

Short Communication

In this paper we present anatomic parameters for nipple position in males. Large form of gynecomastia with significant ptosis, after massive weight loss, and in female to male trans sexual patients, pose a challenge to surgeon with respect to relocation of the nipple on the chest wall. In order to establish guidelines for the placement of the nipple we set out to determine these anatomic parameters. Fifty-two male between the ages of 17 years to 78 years were chosen for this study. The males selected with ideal body weight and without evidence of gynecomastia. The distance from the sternal notch to the nipple, the sternal line to the nipple, the midclavicular point to the nipple, the midaxillary line to the nipple and the acromion point to the nipple was recorded. The mean distance was determined for each category. The validity of these values was confirmed with statistical analysis. We have determined the nipple position in males to be approximately 12 cm from midsternal line and 15cm from Mid-clavicle point and 22 cm from sternal notch and 14 cm from xyphoid. The breast is considered a symbol of femininity and numerous studies have addressed the aesthetic proportion of nipples and areolae in women [1-4]. Although a need exists for plastic surgeons to consider nipple position in men in certain situations, literature pertaining to the anatomic feature of male nipples is limited. Breast reduction during the gender reassignment process for biological women requires movement of the nipple to a new position [5-8]. The new nipple position should be chosen carefully to achieve a male chest that appears natural. In addition, during treatment of gynecomastia, the nipple position and areola size should be arranged within the normal morphologic ranges for men [9-11]. In the study we used landmarks such as sternal notch, midsternal line, midaxillary line, midclavicle point, acromion point and xyphoid.

Methods

Participants
Fifty-two healthy Iranian were included in the study, which was performed from august 2016 to august 2017. All study participants were volunteers. The study was performed according to the institutional ethical guidelines of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Measurements
The anamic landmarks utilized for measurement purposes were distance the midsternal line to the nipple, sterna notch to the nipple, the midclavicle point to the nipple, the acromion point to the nipple and midaxillary line to the nipple (Figure 1). The following parameters were measured by one examiner, with the same measuring tap in the same room, with temperature maintained at 25°C.

Table 1

Another alt text

Table 1
Statistical analysis.

Results

The age range of study participants was 17 years to 78 years. (Mean 45 years) Mean distance from midsternal line to the nipple was 12 cm. Mean distance from sternal notch to the nipple was 22 cm. Mean distance from midclavicle point to the nipple was 15 cm. Mean distance from acromion point to the nipple was 20 cm (Table 1-5). Mean distance from xyphoid to the nipple was 14 cm. Mean height of the sternum was 14.6 cm. The ratio between the sternum height and the nipple to midsternal line was 1.21. The ratio between the sternum height and the nipple to midclavicle point was 0.97 (~1).

Figure 1

Another alt text

Figure 1
Nipple and midaxillary line to the nipple.
1. STN: Sternal notch
2. A: Midclavicular point
3. B: Acromion point

Discussion

In the medical literature female nipples have been given substantially more attention than male nipples. Although breast feeding which is the function of the nipple and areola is important for women as a symbol of maternity and feminity. This function does not apply to men. Moreover, disease involving the nipple and areola occur more frequently in women [12]. However, unlike women, men commonly expose their nipples during recreational
• nlsternum: left nipple to sternum
• nrclavicular: right nipple to clavicle point
• nlclavicular: left nipple to clavicle point
• nracromion: right nipple to acromion point
• nlacromion: left nipple to acromion point
• nrlaxillary: left nipple to mid axillary line
• nrraxillary: right nipple to mid axillary line,.br/> • nrxyphoid: right nipple to xyphoid
• nlxyphoid: left nipple to xypho
activities or exercise and therefore patient satisfaction with the aesthetic appearance of nipple and areola after female-to-male gender reassignment or gynecomastia procedures is important. Because men do not have underlying breast to serve as a cosmetic buffer, morphologic abnormalities of the nipple and areola may be more obvious and can directly affect the appearance of the chest. Therefore, we believe that studies of male nipples are as important as studies of female nipples. The qualitative information about general characteristics presented in this study may be useful for intuitive adjustment. In our opinion, patients are more likely to be satisfied when surgeons intuitively adjust the nipple position per their aesthetic judgment, rather than adhering to standards obtained through theoretical calculations reported previously.

Table 2

Another alt text

Table 2
Report.

Table 3

Another alt text

Table 3
Report.

Table 4

Another alt text

Table 4
Report.

Table 5

Another alt text

Table 5
Report.

Conclusion

Findings of the present study provide quantitative guidelines for decisions on appropriate nipple position. The combined application of those guidelines and the surgeon’s intuitive adjustment should optimize surgical result.

References

  1. Borges JLC, Miranda ISM, Sarquis MMS, Borba V, Maeda SS, Lazaretti-Castro M, et al. Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Vitamin D. J Clin Densitom. 2017.
  2. Ducloux R, Nobécourt E, Chevallier JM, Ducloux H, Elian N, Altman JJ. Vitamin D deficiency before bariatric surgery: Should supplement intake be routinely prescribed? Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):556-60.
  3. Yang L, Colditz GA. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 2007-2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1412-3.
  4. Prentice AM. The emerging epidemic of obesity in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(1):93-9.
  5. Hanefeld M, Pistrosch F, Bornstein SR, Birkenfeld AL. The metabolic vascular syndrome - guide to an individualized treatment. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016;17(1):5-17.
  6. BRASIL M. Vigitel Brasil 2015. 2012.
  7. Paulus GF, de Vaan LEG, Verdam FJ, Bouvy ND, Ambergen TAW, van Heurn LWE. Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Adolescents: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):860-78.
  8. Luger M, Kruschitz R, Marculescu R, Haslacher H, Hoppichler F, Kallay E, et al. The link between obesity and vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop gastric bypass surgery - a vitamin D supplementation trial to compare the efficacy of postoperative cholecalciferol loading (LOAD): study protocol for a randomized controlled tri. Trials. 2015;16:328.
  9. Barzin M, Hosseinpanah F, Motamedi MA, Shapoori P, Arian P, Daneshpour MA, et al. Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS) Rationale and Study Design. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1):e8.
  10. Williams SE. Metabolic bone disease in the bariatric surgery patient. J Obes. 2011;2011:634614.
  11. Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219-234.