Case Report

Sclerotherapy and Resection of a Giant Lymphatic Malformation of the Head in a Neonate

Colin Muncie1*, Richard Whitlock1, Michael Morris1, Claude Harbarger2 and David Sawaya1
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, MS, USA
2Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, MS, USA


*Corresponding author: Colin Muncie, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, USA


Published: 30 Dec, 2016
Cite this article as: Muncie C, Whitlock R, Morris M, Harbarger C, Sawaya D. Sclerotherapy and Resection of a Giant Lymphatic Malformation of the Head in a Neonate. Clin Surg. 2016; 1: 1275.

Abstract

Lymphatic malformations, sometimes referred to as “lymphangiomas” are composed of malformed, dilated lymphatic channels. They should be removed either for cosmesis or function when located in the head and neck region. They have traditionally been approached surgically. However, high recurrence rates with surgery alone have caused multimodal therapy to be an attractive approach. We present a case report of a giant macrocystic lesion of the head approached with staged therapy, in an attempt to salvage the patient’s involved ear.
Keywords: Lymphatic Malformation; Neonate; Head

Introduction

Lymphatic malformations (LM) are non-malignant collections of enlarged lymphatic channels or vessels. They are most commonly found in the head and neck region of infants. Although benign, they tend to have a high rate of recurrence after resection. Due to this challenge, a variety of treatment modalities exist to remove these masses. This case report discusses the drainage, sclerotherapy, and delayed resection of a giant lymphatic malformation in the left temporal region of a neonate.


Case Presentation

This patient presented as a 2-day-old female, born at 38 weeks gestational age by uncomplicated vaginal delivery. She was 2.8 kg at birth and had limited prenatal care. She was noted on delivery to have a large fluid-filled mass on the left side of her head, displacing the ear inferiorly. The auricle was noted to be floating on the surface of the cystic structure. Her mother had been unaware of any abnormalities prior to delivery. The mass was evaluated by MRI, which showed a large macrocystic, fluid-filled lesion, without evidence of intracranial extension. The mass measured at 11 cm x 10 cm. After discussion with plastic surgery and otolaryngology, it was felt that the ear was potentially viable. Due to concerns of local infection of the cyst, when erythema from the external auditory meatus developed, antibiotics were initiated. When the cellulitis improved plans were made for intervention.
At 2 weeks of age the patient underwent drainage followed with sclerotherapy in the operating room. After decompression of 690 ml of straw colored fluid, 45 ml of doxycycline (15 mg/kg) were injected into the cavity. A drain was left in place to aid with decompression and to maintain access for potential future treatments.
Over the next several days it became apparent that the cartilage of the auricle was well developed at that ear would be viable. Therefore the decision was made to perform resection and tacking of the ear in the correct anatomical position. Due to risk of facial nerve injury at this age, restoration of external auditory canal continuity planned to be delayed.
At 1-week post sclerotherapy the patient underwent planned resection. The majority of the mass, along with some excess skin, was excised. A small portion of the cyst was noted to be adherent to the posterior aspect of the auricle. The decision was made to ablate this tissue to avoid injuring the blood supply to the ear. The pinna was fixed in the correct anatomical position, and the skin defect was closed over a drain. Pathology report returned consistent with lymphatic malformation. The patient recovered uneventfully in the neonatal intensive care unit. On post-op day 4, the Jackson Pratt drain was removed. She was discharged home at 1 week post-op.
At her follow up in clinic at 2 months post-op, she showed an acceptable cosmetic result with the ear in position in relation to the temporal bone. Some excess skin was noted superiorly and posteriorly, but there was no evidence of recurrence. Hearing screening on the left ear was performed at 2 months post-op and was interpreted as normal.


Figure 1

Another alt text

Figure 1
L. Temporal Lymphatic Malformation; note the external ear on the inferior margin of the mass.

Figure 2

Another alt text

Figure 2
Large subcutaneous mass extending from the left temporoparietal scalp.

Figure 3

Another alt text

Figure 3
After sclerotherapy and drainage, note drain in dependent portion of remnant skin.

Figure 4

Another alt text

Figure 4
2 month post-op visit.

Discussion

Lymphatic malformation, also referred to as cystic hygroma or lymphangioma, is a rare benign malformation of lymphatic vasculature. LMs are traditionally hamartomatous, with approximately 75% of all cases being discovered in the cranio-facial and cervical regions [1]. However, these malformations can occur anywhere in the body, including the chest, abdomen, or axilla [2].
Approximately 66% of cystic lymphangiomas are present at birth, with the majority presenting by the end of the second year of life.
Developmentally, LMs are thought to arise from sequestrations of lymphatic vasculature, which fail to make appropriate connections with draining vasculature [1]. They are classified based on size. Microcystic lymphangiomas are described as containing cysts less than 2 cm in size, while macrocystic lymphangiomas contain cysts greater than 2 cm.
These typically present as a painless cystic mass in the head and neck region. When discovered by antenatal ultrasound, airway obstruction at birth can potentially be anticipated. An Ex-utero Intrapartum Treatment (EXIT procedure) can be performed to avoid prolonged intubation and hypoxia at birth [3]. Partial drainage of the mass to assist with delivery at caesarian section has been reported. In some cases, a tracheostomy may be required before the mass is addressed [4]. However, if presenting after birth without airway compromise these masses typically have an innocuous presentation. Imaging workup can include ultrasound, CT or MRI. The important distinction is whether the intra-cystic component of the mass is macrocystic, microcystic or mixed.
Historically treatment was purely surgical in nature. However, complete resection has been difficult, with recurrence rates as high as 20%. Benazzou et al. [5] noted that a partial resection of head and neck LMs had a 100% recurrence rate. Resection after recurrence has been reported as extremely challenging in the literature [6]. This has inspired the use of alternative therapies such as sclerotherapy. This particular therapy involves drainage of the lesion followed by injection of a solution to ablate the endothelium of the lymphatic mass. Potential agents reported in the literature used for cervicofacial or supraclavicular LMs include; hypertonic saline [4], ETOH [5], sotradecol [7], doxycycline [7], and Ethibloc [8]. Bleomycin [9] is an option for sclerotherapy that has been avoided due to reports of pulmonary fibrosis after systemic use [9]. However, recent literature reports it as effective in treating microcystic disease in children and denied any evidence of pulmonary fibrosis with local use. OK432 has been reported as being used in Europe and Japan as a form of sclerotherapy [10]. It contains cell components of neutralized Streptococcus bacterium, which produce an inflammatory reaction isolated to the cyst itself. Golinelli et al. [10] reported aspiration and injection of OK432 in a supraclavicular LM with no recurrence at 2 years.
Although sclerotherapy as primary therapy has shown promise, two limitations are important to keep in mind. The first is that repeated injections are often required [8]. The second is that sclerotherapy is similar to surgery in that it has a better response to macrocystic disease than microcystic or mixed disease [7,8]. And, although the therapy has displayed good results, reports continue in the literature showing that primary surgery alone continues to have success [11]. Sanger et al. [4] reported the use of combination therapy for treatment of a mixed lesion. Although post-op imaging showed some deep residual microcystic disease, recurrence was not appreciated. Due to the rarity of these cases, no large studies exist comparing outcomes between resection only to the use of sclerotherapy or a combination of the two.
Ghritlaharey et al. [11] reported successful primary resection in a 3 month old with giant lymphangioma displacing the ear. Their patient appeared to have maintained a structurally normal ear with displacement. In our case, it was unclear if the patient would benefit from surgery, as the ear may have become too distorted to be functional. Therefore, initially sclerotherapy was performed with the potential as being solitary therapy. When a structurally normal ear appeared over several days the decision was made to proceed with surgery so that the ear could be placed in the appropriate anatomical position. This staged process afforded a good functional outcome for our patient.


Conclusion

No general consensus has been made about the ideal treatment of lymphatic malformations in the head and neck region. However, the literature shows that macrocystic disease has a better response regardless of treatment used, when compared to microcystic disease. When faced with mixed disease the use of sclerotherapy and surgery simultaneously has shown good outcomes. Staging the combined approach is effective when the function of nearby structures is in question. It remains at the surgeon’s discretion which therapy is best given the situation.


References

  1. Fonkalsrud EW. Pediatric Surgery. 6th Edn. Mosby Inc. Lymphatic disorders. In: Grosfeld Jay L, O’Neill JA, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG, editors. 2006; 2: 2137–2146.
  2. Mirza B, Ijaz L, Saleem M, Sharif M, Sheikh A. Cystic Hygroma: An Overview. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010; 3: 139- 144.
  3. Lazar DA, Olutoye OO, Moise KJ Jr, Ivey RT, Johnson A, Ayres N, et al. Ex-utero Intrapartum Treatment Procedure for Giant Neck Masses—fetal and Maternal Outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 817-822.
  4. Sanger C, Wong L, Wood J, David LR, Argenta LC. Giant Facial Lymphangioma. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 1271-1274.
  5. Benazzou S, Boulaadas M, Essakalli L. Giant Pediatric Cervicofacial Lymphatic Malformations. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24: 1307-1309.
  6. Seffah JD, Adu-Bonsaffoh K. "Giant Recurrent Cystic Lymphangioma: A Case Report." J West African College of Surgeons. 2014: 100-111.
  7. Farnoosh S, Don D, Koempel J, Panossian A, Anselmo D, Stanley P. Efficacy of Doxycycline and Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Sclerotherapy in Pediatric Head and Neck Lymphatic Malformations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79: 883-887.
  8. Emran MA, Dubois J, Laberge L, Al-Jazaeri A, Bütter A, Yazbeck S. Alcoholic Solution of Zein (Ethibloc) Sclerotherapy for Treatment of Lymphangiomas in Children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41: 975-979.
  9. Chaudry G, Guevara CJ, Rialon KL, Kerr C, Mulliken JB, Greene AK, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Bleomycin Sclerotherapy for Microcystic Lymphatic Malformation. CardioVasc Intervent Radiol. 2014; 37: 1476-1481.
  10. Golinelli G, Toso A, Borello G, Aluffi P, Pia F. Percutaneous Sclerotherapy with OK-432 of a Cervicomediastinal Lymphangioma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 1879-1881.
  11. Ghritlaharey RK. Management of Giant Cystic Lymphangioma in an Infant. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 1755-1756.