Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2021;6(1):3046.Research Article | Open Access

Management of Enterovesical Fistulas: Analysis of 33 Patients Treated at a Single Tertiary Reference Center

Adam Bobkiewicz, Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki, Krzysztof Szmyt, Adam Studniarek, Tomasz Banasiewicz and Lukasz Krokowicz

Department of General Endocrinological Surgery and Gastroenterological Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland

*Correspondance to: Lukasz Krokowicz 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.3046

Abstract

Background: Enterovesical Fistula (EVF) is defined as a pathological communication between the intestinal lumen and the urinary bladder. EVF is a relatively rare finding in a complicated diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, radiation or trauma. We presented our ten-year experience in the field of EVF management. Methods: Thirty-three patients were enrolled into this study. This retrospective study investigated the clinical presentation, underlying pathology, diagnostic tests, and surgical management including urinary bladder, perioperative complications and the long-term outcome obtained by administering a phone survey as a follow-up. Results: The most common underlying etiologies of EVF were Crohn?s disease (n=11) and colorectal cancer (n=10). The most common symptom was a nonspecific suprapubic pain reported in 60.6% of patients. The pathognomonic symptoms such as pneumaturia and faecaluria were present in 51.5% and 39.4% of the patients, respectively. Barium enema was the diagnostic study of choice performed in 63.6% of the patients. In 14 patients, the resection with primary anastomosis was performed. Ten patients developed perioperative complications. No recurrent fistulas were observed at the time of follow-up. Conclusion: Resection with primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in the majority of patients. In cases of advanced colorectal cancer, we recommended Hartmann?s procedure as a method of choice. Surgery performed in well-experienced centers determines the effectiveness of the EVF management characterized by the low mortality rate and perioperative complications.

Keywords

Enterovesical fistula; Intestinal fistula; Primary anastomosis; Surgery

Cite the article

Bobkiewicz A, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Szmyt K, Studniarek A, Banasiewicz T, Krokowicz L. Management of Enterovesical Fistulas: Analysis of 33 Patients Treated at a Single Tertiary Reference Center. Clin Surg. 2021; 6: 3046.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
RAF Kinase Inhibitory Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Profiles in Oral Cancers
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Use of the Intrathoracic Tube for Repositioning Free Flap Pedicle via Transoral Approach
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Healthy Years of Life Lost in Shaanxi Province, Western China: An Evidence from the 2018 National Health Service Survey
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...