Journal Basic Info
- Impact Factor: 1.995**
- H-Index: 8
- ISSN: 2474-1647
- DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
Major Scope
- Breast Surgery
- Transplant Surgery
- Neurological Surgery
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
- Plastic Surgery
- Endocrine Surgery
- Bariatric Surgery
Abstract
Citation: Clin Surg. 2020;5(1):2980.Research Article | Open Access
Distal Fibula Fracture Fixation: Biomechanical Evaluation of One Third Tubular vs. Anatomical Contoured Locking Plate
Andrew Carlson B1 , Amir Beltagi1 , Jamal Ahmad2 , Jason Koh1 and Farid Amirouche1,2*
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Illinois-Chicago, USA 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Spine Institute, NorthShore University HealthSystem, USA
*Correspondance to: Farid Amirouche
PDF Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2980
Abstract
Background: This investigation compares the biomechanical properties of one-third tubular and newer anatomically contoured locking plate-and-screw implants for fixation of Danis-Weber Type B (OTA 44B) distal fibula lateral malleolar fractures in Saw-Bones models. Methods: This study utilized fibula Saw-Bones that were osteotomized to simulate a distal fracture and plated with one-third tubular or locking plates. Valgus bending and torsional tests were performed for each plated specimen. Results: A statistically significantly higher (P=0.001) peak load to failure during valgus bending was observed in specimens with anatomical locking plates over one-third tubular plates. There was no significant difference between the stiffness of the two plate constructs during valgus bending. The anatomically contoured plate construct withstood a significantly higher (P
Keywords
Cite the article
Andrew Carlson B, Beltagi A, Ahmad J, Koh J, Amirouche F. Distal Fibula Fracture Fixation: Biomechanical Evaluation of One Third Tubular vs. Anatomical Contoured Locking Plate. Clin Surg. 2020; 5: 2980.