Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Bariatric Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery
  •  Obstetrics Surgery
  •  Urology
  •  Breast Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2019;4(1):2612.Research Article | Open Access

Study of Hemorrhagic Gastroduodenal Ulcers Treated by Emergency Endoscopic Hemostasis: Comparison between the Current Situation and that before 10 Years

Nobuhiro Dan, Kazuhisa Yamaguchi, Takafumi Otsuka, Kazuhiro Fuchinoue, Kazunori Hijikata, Tomoko Kobayashi, Yoshiro Yamamoto, Takahito Toba, Yoshinori Kikuchi and Yoshinori Igarashi

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan

*Correspondance to: Nobuhiro Dan 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.2612

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To conduct a comparative study of changes in terms of the endoscopic hemostasis methods used over the past 10 years and patient characteristics, in cases of Gastroduodenal ulcer treated by emergency upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in our hospital. Methods: Patients who had undergone emergency upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in our hospital from January 2004 to December 2006 and January 2014 to December 2016 were categorized into Group A and Group B, respectively, based on the time period. The two groups were compared retrospectively by extracting the patient characteristics, hemostasis method, and various risk factors. Results: The number of cases that required hemostatic treatment tended to decrease with time (138 cases vs. 75 cases). The mean age of patients increased in Groups A and B (59.4 years vs. 66.7 years, p<0.01). Helicobacter pylori infection rate showed a slight declining tendency (90.0% vs. 85.0%, p=0.33), but there was an increase in the number of patients taking oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (17.0% vs. 36.0%, p<0.01) and oral antithrombotic agents (12.0% vs. 23.0%, p=0.02).The endoscopic clipping method was reduced (67.0% vs. 29.0%, p<0.01). The number of local ethanol injections decreased markedly (40.0% vs. 4.0% p<0.01). However, there was a marked increase in the number of cases subjected to cauterization using hemostatic forceps (4.0% vs. 80.0%, p<0.01). Conclusion: While changes that took place over time did not affect H. pylori infection, cases treated using local injections of ethanol or clipping decreased in number, whereas cases subjected to hemostasis methods using high-frequency coagulation increased.

Keywords

Cite the article

Dan N, Yamaguchi K, Otsuka T, Fuchinoue K, Hijikata K, Kobayashi T, et al. Study of Hemorrhagic Gastroduodenal Ulcers Treated by Emergency Endoscopic Hemostasis: Comparison between the Current Situation and that before 10 Years. Clin Surg. 2019; 4: 2612..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

A Nerve Sparing Procedure for Posterior Access Thoracolumbar Fracture Surgery
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Quantitative Evaluation of Subzygomatic Depression Secondary to Single Longitudinal Masseter Hypertrophy with Botulinum Toxin A Injection Using Three-dimensional Scanning Technique
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...