Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.995**
  • H-Index: 8
  • ISSN: 2474-1647
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Transplant Surgery
  •  Minimally Invasive Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
  •  Vascular Surgery
  •  Endocrine Surgery
  •  Emergency Surgery

Abstract

Citation: Clin Surg. 2017;2(1):1445.Research Article | Open Access

Volume Change after Primary Breast Augmentation: Predicting and Defining a Significant Cause for Re-Operation

Hunter R Moyer and Jessica Yeager

Department of Plastic Surgery, Emory University, USA

*Correspondance to: Hunter R Moyer 

 PDF  Full Text DOI: 10.25107/2474-1647.1445

Abstract

Introduction: Accepted re-operation rates after primary breast augmentation range between 20% to 30% with requests for volume change as a leading cause. This is the first report to characterize this patient population and define actual volume changes.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 812 patients that underwent primary augmentation mammaplasty at the authors’ previous surgery center over a fifteen year period. On average, patients were white females, 36 years old and with a BMI of 21.0 kg/m2. They were augmented primarily with Mentor Moderate Profile implants (average 318 cc) in the sub-muscular plane (51.9%). Charts were queried for patient demographics and implant characteristics. A Chi square test was used to compare binary data and a Student’s t-test and correlation coefficients were used to compare ordinal data.Results: Our mean follow-up was 2.2 years (range 0 to 13 years) with a rate at six years of 31.5%. The re-operation rate was 20.1% at three years and 5.7% of patients underwent volume change. Women requesting a volume change were four times more likely to have saline implants (p=0.001), thinner, and have larger implants placed at initial operation (p=0.012). Examining the 46 patients revised for volume dissatisfaction, the average change was 10.2% larger (35.0 cc, range: -235 cc to 170 cc). Women requesting larger implants had significantly more augmentations in the submuscular plane and those requesting smaller implants had significantly more augmentations in the sub-glandular plane (p=0.022). Time to re-operation, age, BMI, and type of fill material did not significantly influence a woman’s desire to be larger or smaller.Discussion: A majority of women re-operated on for volume discrepancy wished to be larger (66.0%). Patients dissatisfied with their volume had significantly more saline devices and larger implants at initial operation. Pocket location also significantly influences a patient’s perception of breast size.

Keywords

Size; Volume; Change; Augmentation; Breast

Cite the article

Moyer HR, Yeager J. Volume Change after Primary Breast Augmentation: Predicting and Defining a Significant Cause for Re-Operation. Clin Surg. 2017; 2: 1445.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Sildenafil Transiently Delays Early Alveolar Bone Healing of Tooth Extraction Sockets
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Use of the Intrathoracic Tube for Repositioning Free Flap Pedicle via Transoral Approach
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Intralobar Pulmonary Sequestration with Successful Preservation of the Lung Lobe after Intraoperative Marking: A Case Report
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...